Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


Perhaps this should have been the What I’ve Been Reading This:  Governor Edition.  While I came across several articles worth highlighting this week, the two below in regard to developments in California and Michigan are noteworthy.  If readers find the time, I would suggest diving deeper into the below circumstances surrounding the situations in California and Michigan as there are several nuanced details worth reading.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


California Governor Relies Upon Support of Organized Labor In Recall Fight

As Politico reports, California Governor Gavin Newsom is relying upon the support (and money) of organized labor to coalesce around him heading into the recall election that is expected to take place in the coming months.  The Governor, a staunch supporter of organized labor, enjoyed the support of unions in 2018 when he was elected.  (During that election, organized labor spent about $12 million to support Newsom’s candidacy.)  Heading into the upcoming recall election, organized labor has spent around $2 million so far with the expectation that more money will be put behind the Governor in the coming weeks and months.  For a recall election that could impact the success of employee and labor friendly initiatives in the state, I would expect to see an increase in spending in an effort to help the Governor survive the recall election.


Michigan Governor Proposes Using $300 Million of Covid Aid to Boost Statewide Minimum Wage Rate

Michigan Governor Gretchen Witmer recently introduced a proposal that would use $300 million of Covid aid to boost the statewide minimum wage rate in Michigan to $15/hour.  Under the Governor’s proposal, the state would provide grants to employers to fund the difference between the current rate of pay and $15...so long as employers agreed to pay $15/hour for three months thereafter.  Granted, with this proposal needing to be approved the the Republican controlled Legislature in Michigan, this proposal might remain just that...a proposal that does not advance past initial discussions.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per