Skip to main content

Happening Today: Senate HELP Committee to Vote on OSHA Nominee

 

Today, the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor & Pensions (“HELP”) is set to vote on President Joe Biden’s nomination of Doug Parker to serve as the head of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”).

The HELP Committee, which currently has majority control by Democrats, is expected to clear Parker’s nomination (likely along party lines) and send it to the Senate for further debate and a vote.  The new head of OSHA will be stepping into what many think is the tail end of a rather turbulent time in regard to workplace safety.  After nearly a year and a half into the coronavirus pandemic, workplace safety has been a hot topic at OSHA as several requirements and recommendations have been released in regard to protecting workers against the pandemic.  These OSHA requirements and recommendations, in regard to workplace safety, have involved requiring face coverings in the workplace, stipulating how many workers are allowed in a confined work space, how employers are to handle workers that contract the coronavirus, etc.

Should Parker be confirmed, which at this point appears likely, he would oversee OSHA’s efforts to continue taking steps to protect workers as well as investigating workplace safety issues.  Even with the coronavirus pandemic appearing to be tapering off in the U.S., I suspect that concerns will still arise over how workers can (and should be) protected against related outbreaks in the workplace going forward.  Parker, as the head of OSHA, would certainly have the ability to shape OSHA’s policies in that regard, should he be confirmed.


For additional information:  https://www.help.senate.gov/hearings/nominations6921

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more