Skip to main content

New Laws for 2021: Vaccine Anti-Retaliation Ordinance (Chicago)

 

On April 21st, the Chicago City Council passed the Vaccine Anti-Retaliation Ordinance (“Ordinance”) which establishes protections for Chicago workers that take time off work to get their vaccine.

The Ordinance requires employers in the city to allow workers to take time off to obtain their vaccine without retaliating against them in regard to their terms and conditions of employment.  Notably, this Ordinance applies regardless of whether the worker voluntarily chooses to get a vaccine or whether the employer requires it.

It is important to recognize that the Ordinance does not require employers to pay workers for the time off to get the vaccine (unless the employer mandates it.)  However, employers are required to allow workers to use any paid time off for time spent getting the vaccine during work hours.  With that being said, it is at a worker’s sole discretion whether or not to use paid time off to get the vaccine (as workers could instead simply choose not to be paid for this time spent getting the vaccine during work hours rather than using paid time off); employers are prohibited from required the use of paid time off.

For employers in the city that mandate getting the vaccine, they are required to pay workers for the time spent getting the vaccine (if the vaccine is during a work shift), at a worker’s regular rate of pay capped at four hours/vaccine dose.  These employers are prohibited from requiring workers to use paid time off as an alternative to paying them their regular rate of pay.

For Chicago employers that run afoul of the Ordinance, they could be subject to fines ranging from $1,000 - $5,000/violation.


For additional information:  https://www.chicago.gov/city/en/depts/cdph/provdrs/health_protection_and_response/news/2021/april/city-council-passes-vaccine-anti-retaliation-ordinance-that-prov.htmlhttps://www.chicago.gov/city/en/depts/cdph/provdrs/health_protection_and_response/news/2021/april/city-council-passes-vaccine-anti-retaliation-ordinance-that-prov.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more