Skip to main content

Labor Secretary Voices Support For Classifying Gig Workers As Employees

 

Late last week, Labor Secretary Marty Walsh voiced his support for classifying gig workers (such as those that work for Uber, Lyft, Grubhub, etc.) as employees rather than independent contractors.

The announcement does not necessarily come as a surprise but rather one step closer to these gig workers being reclassified.  Many might now be wondering what happens next.  Well, in short, just because the Labor Department (and Biden administration) think that gig workers should be classified as employees does not automatically make it happen.  Instead, what would need to occur is for Congress to pass a measure (similar to California’s AB 5) that would reclassify gig workers across the country.  Bear in mind, however, that is no sure thing.  In fact, I would suggest that trying to get that measure through Congress (even with Democrats having majority control of both the House and Senate) is no sure thing.

Another “easier” option would be to have the Labor Department issue new rulings which would set the legal guideline for how employers treat workers.  With the Labor Secretary voicing his support for reclassifying gig workers, this is a more likely option.

For those wondering why gig employers are not keen to the idea of classifying their workers as employees, it in essence comes down to money.  Should these gig workers suddenly be classified as employees, they would be entitled to a minimum wage, overtime pay, paid leave, health insurance, etc.  It goes without saying that these gig employers would be on the hook for the increase in labor costs...which would drastically eat into their bottom line.  (It should come as no surprised that Uber, Lyft, and other related gig employers saw their stock prices tumble after the Labor Secretary’s comments last week.

I will reiterate that while nothing is official and there has been no change to how gig workers are classified in the U.S., this is one situation that is likely to change in the not too distant future.


For additional information:  https://www.reuters.com/world/us/exclusive-us-labor-secretary-says-most-gig-workers-should-be-classified-2021-04-29/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more