Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

 

A noteworthy, to say the least topic, comes out of England after Uber announced earlier this week that it would classify its driver in the country as employees rather than independent contractors.  As noted below, this is not the definitive decision that will impact all Uber drivers worldwide, but it is a development worth leading things off this week. 

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Uber Announces Plan to Classify Its England Drivers As Employees

Adam Santariano at The New York Times wrote an article earlier this week in which he noted the somewhat surprising announcement from Uber that it had decided to classify its more than 70,000 drivers in England as employees, which will thus provide these drivers with a minimum wage, vacation, and a pension.  It has been no secret that Uber (and other gig companies) have long fought attempts to reclassify their workers as employees rather than independent contractors.  (In fact, that is still an ongoing fight stateside.)  While Uber’s announcement for its driver in England will not necessarily mean that all of its driver worldwide will be classified as employees, it certainly makes that a much more realistic option than it had been when Uber was contesting this reclassification fight tooth and nail.


Right to Work Legislation Falters in Montana Legislature

Recently, an attempt by Montana State Representative Caleb Hinkle to advance his legislation to make Montana a right to work state was summarily defeated by a 38 - 62 vote in opposition to the bill.  (It is worth recognizing that the Montana House is comprised of 67 Republicans and 33 Democrats, yet 29 Republicans voted to oppose the bill.)  Had the legislation advanced (and become law), Montana would have become a right to work state in which required payment of union dues (by non union members) would not be a permissible condition of employment.  Without a right to work law in effect, an employer can lawfully require a non union employee pay union dues as a condition of employment.  (Those union dues go toward the costs of collective bargaining by the union on behalf of all employees, regardless of whether or not they are union members.)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more