Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week: President Joe Biden Edition

 

Apologies to those expecting a post talking about more nuanced labor & employment law topics without a touch of politics.  With this week being the inauguration and the incoming administration already taking action with the termination of the National Labor Relations Board’s General Counsel Wednesday evening, there are a couple related topics that are highly relevant to close out the week.  While the last article is not necessarily “President Biden” specific, I wanted to highlight the article to provide readers a bit of food for thought.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Biden Administration’s Potential $15/Hour Minimum Wage Hike & the Ramifications

On the heels of Joe Biden getting sworn in on Wednesday, there are already talks over a potential federal minimum wage hike to $15/hour.  With Democrats controlling both the House and Senate, it is likely (if not probable) that we will see a minimum wage bill headed to President Biden’s desk sooner rather than later.  In anticipation of that, the Congressional Budget Office has released a report in which it speculates that approximately 3.7 million jobs would be lost if the federal minimum wage rate got raised to $15/hour.  Whether that figure is too conservative (or too liberal) is up for debate.  Should the federal minimum wage rate be increased during President Biden’s term, however, we might see whether this 3.7 million job loss forecast is on the money.


What A Paid Leave Policy Might Look Like Under a President Biden Administration

The New York Times made note earlier this week of a paid leave proposal being floated by the Biden administration.  Under the proposal, full and part time workers would be paid up to $1,400/week (to replace their wages) to take fourteen weeks (or more) of paid leave.  The grounds for using the paid leave would include:  an employee being sick with coronavirus symptoms, quarantine because of coronavirus exposure, needing time off to get a vaccine, caring for family members who are sick with coronavirus symptoms, caring for children whose school or day care center was closed because of the pandemic, and caring for older relatives or adult dependents whose long term care facilities were closed because of the pandemic.  As many readers are likely wondering, how would the paid leave be funded?  Employers with less than 500 employees would be reimbursed in the form of a payroll tax credit.  Larger employers would be required to cover the cost themselves.  Will this proposal make it across the finish line?  With the prior paid leave lapsing and Congress intent to do something, while this proposal might be a starting point, I think it is likely we will see something in the coming months.


Would You Give Up Your Vacation Time In Exchange For Remote Work?

According to a recent study, approximately 50% of those polled said they would give up their vacation time in exchange for being allowed to work remotely.  As we have seen over the past ten or so months, while allowing employees to work remotely might have been untenable at first, it has quickly become commonplace (and successful) for many.  That is not to say there will not continue to be hiccups for many that choose to work remotely.  However, with many employees still being given latitude to determine when they feel comfortable returning to the workplace (kudos to those employers that remain flexible...while I refrain from too harshly chastising those employers that demand employees return to the workplace), perhaps a trade off of (some) vacation time for remote work is not out of the question.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more