Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

 

The special elections are done in Georgia, the Presidential election has been certified, and we are only a few weeks away from the inauguration of Joe Biden as the 46th President.  Once we clear that final “hurdle” (the inauguration), I would suspect we will start to see Congress introduce labor & employment bills that will work their way through committees and eventually to a debate on the House and Senate floors.  With Congress on the mind, I think it is appropriate to give a nod to the lapsed paid leave and subsequent calls for Congress to step in and take action.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Congress Allows Paid Leave Under FFCRA to Expire...What’s Next?

When Congress passed the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCRA”) back in March, the legislation provided two weeks of paid leave for employees that contracted the coronavirus or were required to quarantine because of possible exposure.  However, the FFCRA only provided this paid leave through December 31, 2020.  While Congress approved a $900 billion coronavirus relief bill at the end of December, this paid leave was not extended into the new year.  It is worth noting that while employers can still voluntarily provide this leave to their employers (and receive a tax credit for doing so), this tax credit option is only available through the end of March.  For those employers that have chosen to take advantage of this tax credit, kudos.  However, I would expect that come April 1st, many if not most employers will no longer offer this leave.  Attention should then turn to Congress and what, if anything, they will do to pass another coronavirus related bill that includes paid leave.  Stay tuned.


Google is Latest Company That Appears Open to Flexible Work Schedules

Deadline wrote an article recently in which it noted that while Google has again pushed back its return to work date (physically present in the workplace that is) for many of its workers, the company has expressed interest in offering a flexible work schedule to its workers.  The specifics of what that would look like remain a bit unclear, but reportedly the company is looking at having employees in the workplace three days a week and then working remotely for the remainder.  Google has noted that it finds allowing its employees to have a flexible work schedule (including the option to work remotely) has actually increased productivity.  Whether the company will proceed with implementing a flexible work schedule for its employees in the coming months remains to be seen...but is something I would expect other tech companies to consider should Google follow through with the plan.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more