Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

 

The special elections are done in Georgia, the Presidential election has been certified, and we are only a few weeks away from the inauguration of Joe Biden as the 46th President.  Once we clear that final “hurdle” (the inauguration), I would suspect we will start to see Congress introduce labor & employment bills that will work their way through committees and eventually to a debate on the House and Senate floors.  With Congress on the mind, I think it is appropriate to give a nod to the lapsed paid leave and subsequent calls for Congress to step in and take action.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Congress Allows Paid Leave Under FFCRA to Expire...What’s Next?

When Congress passed the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCRA”) back in March, the legislation provided two weeks of paid leave for employees that contracted the coronavirus or were required to quarantine because of possible exposure.  However, the FFCRA only provided this paid leave through December 31, 2020.  While Congress approved a $900 billion coronavirus relief bill at the end of December, this paid leave was not extended into the new year.  It is worth noting that while employers can still voluntarily provide this leave to their employers (and receive a tax credit for doing so), this tax credit option is only available through the end of March.  For those employers that have chosen to take advantage of this tax credit, kudos.  However, I would expect that come April 1st, many if not most employers will no longer offer this leave.  Attention should then turn to Congress and what, if anything, they will do to pass another coronavirus related bill that includes paid leave.  Stay tuned.


Google is Latest Company That Appears Open to Flexible Work Schedules

Deadline wrote an article recently in which it noted that while Google has again pushed back its return to work date (physically present in the workplace that is) for many of its workers, the company has expressed interest in offering a flexible work schedule to its workers.  The specifics of what that would look like remain a bit unclear, but reportedly the company is looking at having employees in the workplace three days a week and then working remotely for the remainder.  Google has noted that it finds allowing its employees to have a flexible work schedule (including the option to work remotely) has actually increased productivity.  Whether the company will proceed with implementing a flexible work schedule for its employees in the coming months remains to be seen...but is something I would expect other tech companies to consider should Google follow through with the plan.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more