Skip to main content

Labor Department Issues Guidance For Federally Mandated Notices In Virtual Workplaces

 

At the end of last week, the Labor Department issued guidance on how employers can comply with posting federally mandated notices in a virtual workplace.

Readers might recall previously reading that several statutes (such as the Fair Labor Standards Act and Family Medical Leave Act, among others) require employers post a notice of rights in a conspicuous location in the workplace.  As you might imagine, when employees are not physically present in the workplace (as many employees are not right now because of the coronavirus), these employees are not able to view the posted notices.

Never fear, the Labor Department has issued guidance to allow employers to still get these notices to employees while employees work in a virtual workplace.  For one time notice requirements, employers may provide the notice via email to employees so long as employees customarily receive emails from the employer.  For continuous notice requirements, the Labor Department makes a distinction between employers with some remote employees and those employers that have a workforce that is entirely remote.

Note, if an employer has a “split” workforce, the Labor Department stipulates that physical notice posters are required for the workers physically present.  In regard to the rest of the workforce that works remotely, the Labor Department “encourages” electronic posting of the notice poster.

Note, if an employer has a workforce that is entirely remote, the Labor Department, providing the notice may be done electronically so long as all employees work remotely, all employees customarily receive information from the employer via electronic means, all employees have “readily available access” to the electronic posting at all times, and the employer takes steps to inform the employees where the notice is posted and how to access it.

It goes without saying that the workplace arrangements for many employers and employees remains in flux.  While the Labor Department’s guidance was only just recently released, it is worth reviewing and incorporating to ensure compliance with the relevant statute/statutes.


For additional information:  https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/WHD/legacy/files/fab_2020_7.pdf

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more