Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


There are always a few good articles I come across throughout the month which are particularly noteworthy.  In particular, the case currently working its way through the U.S. Supreme Court that addresses whether LGBTQ workers fall within an already pre-defined protected class (and therefore ‘qualify’ as an aggrieved party that can bring a discrimination claim against their employer if they are discriminated against) has the potential to flip things on their head...depending how the Court rules on the matter.  The below article from Bloomberg is well worth a read.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


NLRB Advice Memo: Employer Cannot Require Employees Use Their Real Names on Social Media

Earlier this month, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) published an advice memo in which it found that employers are barred from implementing policies that require employees use their real names when using social media.  The issue came about as a result of CVS having a policy in place that requires its employees use their real names on social media when discussing their employment.  However, this policy was found to have imposed a significant burden on an employee’s Section 7 Rights under that National Labor Relations Act, this that these type of social media policies are improper.


Justice Department Pushes EEOC to Change LGBTQ Position

In recent weeks, the President Donald Trump era Department of Justice has continued pushing the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) to reverse its stance on LGBTQ discrimination in the workplace.  Currently, the EEOC maintains the same position it had when President Barack Obama was in office:  Employers are banned from discriminating against LGBTQ employees as this is held to be a form of sex discrimination.  However, the Department of Justice is attempting to pursuade the EEOC to support the notion that Congress did not intend for LGBTQ workers to fall within the protected scope of anti-discrimination laws when legislation was previously passed.  With an upcoming case set for oral arguments before the Supreme Court on October 8th on this very topic, this is one to keep a close eye on going forward.


Alabama’s Equal Pay Law Set to Go Into Effect September 1st

This coming Sunday, Alabama will become the 49th state to have enacted an equal pay law for workers in the state.  The law, a long time coming, will now provide employees that have been discriminated against because of their gender or race, an option to sue under this Alabama state law as well as federal law.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more