Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


I think I spent more time on the road this week for work than I did at my desk in the office.  As a matter of fact, I know that to be the case.  As a result of rushing to catch several flights and driving for hours on end to get to courthouses in small counties, I had little time to read through articles this week.  With that being said, when the news broke Wednesday afternoon that an impasse had been reached in the mediation over the U.S. Women's National Team's equal pay suit, I knew that was a particular matter that I wanted to highlight this week.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Mediation Breaks Down in U.S. Women's National Team's Equal Pay Lawsuit

As Liz Clarke writes, after a three day mediation of the U.S. Women's National Team's equal pay lawsuit against the U.S. Soccer Federation, talks broke down Wednesday with diminishing signs of a chance for the parties to reach a settlement before trial.  Both sides subsequently released sharply worded remarks, criticizing the other side for the stalemate.  Assuming talks do not resume in the coming weeks, the case is headed for a jury trial.


Lawsuit Challenges Parental Leave Policy for Men at Law Firm, Jones Day

This past Tuesday, a lawsuit was filed against a law firm, Jones Day, on the grounds that the policy is discriminatory toward male employees.  The lawsuit alleged that Jones Day offers female employees eight more weeks of leave than their male counterparts, and when one male employee complained about the policy, he was subsequently terminated.  This lawsuit addresses one of the more nuanced, but nonetheless important, topics in regard to parental leave:  Whether males in the workplace are being unlawfully discriminated against when their employers offer them less leave than females.  This is certainly a case to keep an eye on going forward.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more