Skip to main content

Founder of Barstool Sports Under Fire For Anti-Union Comments


Dave Portnoy, founder of Barstool Sports, came under fire yesterday when he tweeted several anti-union comments in regard to the possibility of employees at Barstool Sports organizing and forming a union.  (Portnoy founded Barstool Sports in 2013.  In its current form, Barstool Sports is a sports and entertainment network that includes a blog, podcasts, and a boxing promotion.  The company is owned by the Chernin Group, with the Chernin Group holding a 51% interest.)

Before we get into the comments made by Portnoy, let us take a step back.  Some readers might have heard that the editorial staff at the Ringer (a similar sports and entertainment network headed by Bill Simmons, formerly of ESPN) announced earlier this week that they had formed a union.  On the heels of that announcement, Portnoy jumped into the fray and tweeted that he hoped his employees would form a union so he could “smash their little union to smithereens.”  When a staff writer at Live Science commented that current Barstool employees could direct message him and talk about the possibility of forming a union at Barstool Sports, Portnoy tweeted that he would fire any employee on the spot that contacted the staff writer at Live Science.

Now, that was not the end of it.  Democratic New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tweeted a response, to Portnoy’s threat that he would fire any employee that engaged in talks about forming a union, stating that Portnoy’s tweet could be unlawful and in violation of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”).  (In broad terms, the NLRA prohibits employers from terminating or retaliating against employees that engage in protected concerted activity...which can include talks/efforts to form a union.)  Donald Trump, Jr. joined in yesterday evening and commented that Representative Ocasio-Cortez should not have picked a fight with Portnoy, appearing to back Portnoy and his comments earlier in the day.

Now this is the time where I would normally tell employers to be careful what they say to employees in regard to attempts to prevent a union from forming in their workplace.  However, Portnoy’s comments yesterday are a timely reminder that employers should be mindful of their tweets and social media posts as well.  Even if Portnoy was joking that he would terminate an employee for engaging in union discussions, as has been suggested, that is not necessarily a ‘get out of jail free’ card for a charge filed with the National Labor Relations Board.  Given the heightened attention that has been given to conduct in the workplace as of late, employers should be careful what they say (or tweet), or risk running afoul of the NLRA.


For additional information:  https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1041936

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more