Skip to main content

Democratic Presidential Candidate Beto O’Rourke Announces Labor Friendly Proposals


Late last week, Democratic Presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke wrote an op-ed, styled ‘A 21st Century Labor Contract’, in which he announced his plans to enact sweeping labor friendly proposals, should he be elected President in 2020.

Of note, O’Rourke wrote that he would:

  • Allow the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) to impose monetary fines against employers that wrongfully terminate a worker or that in violating the National Labor Relations Act, cause a worker to suffer economic harm.  (Currently, the NLRB can order backpay or reinstatement, but cannot impose fines);
  • Make officers and directors of an employer liable for labor violations if the officers and directors had prior knowledge; and
  • Provide union leaders and managers the ability to agree on minimum standards for an industry, rather than require negotiation among each individual employer in that sector.
As well, O’Rourke voiced his support for the prior joint employer standard enacted during President Barack Obama’s term; increasing the federal hourly minimum wage rate to $15/hour (and eliminate lower wages for tipped workers and disabled workers); supporting the new overtime threshold also proposed during President Obama’s term; and supporting a stricter legal test that would make it harder for employers to classify workers as independent contractors rather than employees.

With O’Rourke a ways back in the polls, it will be interesting to see if these proposals help him gain any traction in the coming months.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...