Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


I found it tougher to narrow things down this week.  Rather than posting a far reaching "What I've Been Reading This Week" post and bombarding readers with a few too many articles, I want to keep this one more concise and to the point.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Elon Musk, Pot, & An Employer’s Ability To Discipline An Employee For Usage

Last week, readers might have seen that Elon Musk went on Joe Rogan’s podcast and appeared to smoke pot at one point during their discussion.  Using that as an example, Catherine Ho at The San Francisco Chronicle wrote an article that addressed whether employers (specifically ones in California) can lawfully discipline or terminate an employee for smoking weed.  Even for employers or employees not in California, this is a good article to page through for a bit of background on how even in states where smoking weed is legal, an employer can still have disciplinary policies in place for an employee’s usage.


Ninth Circuit: Employer Cannot Charge Applicant for Cost of Post-Offer Medical Review

Late last month, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision in a case which held that employers cannot lawfully require applicants to pay for the cost of a post-offer medical review.  This case, EEOC v. BNSF Ry. Co., walks through the entirety of the claim in a rather lengthy opinion.  However, I highlight this case for readers to review given the analysis of whether applicants have to bear the burden of paying for these post-offer medical reviews.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more