Skip to main content

NLRB Chairman Responds to Calls For Recusal of Board Member Emanuel By Democrats


On September 17th, Democratic Senators Elizabeth Warren, Kirsten Gillibrand, Mazie Hirono, Tammy Baldwin, and Cory Booker sent a letter to the Chairman of the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") John Ring and urged him to ensure that Board Member William Emanuel is recused from participating in a case in which his former employer, Littler Mendelson, currently represents a party.  (Quite a mouthful, right?  Let us break things down a bit further to make sure we are all on the same page.)

Purple Communications

In 2014, the NLRB issued a ruling in Purple Communications that found that when an employer grants workers access to company e-mail, the employer cannot interfere with the workers using that e-mail on non-working time to organize and advocate for better working conditions.  That decision was met with much angst among employers and pro-business groups.  Currently, that case is on appeal before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Currently, the NLRB has a case before it, Caesars Entertainment Corporation d/b/a Rio All-Suites Hotel and Casino, which could overturn Purple Communications.  Given that Republican appointed Board Members currently hold a 3 - 2 majority on the NLRB, there is much speculation that Purple Communications' days might be numbered.

Recusal Argument

The Senators that wrote the letter to Chairman Ring have argued that Board Member Emanuel should be recused from the Caesars Entertainment case as his former employer, Littler Mendelson, currently represents the employer in the Purple Communications case.  As a result, these Senators have based their argument on the contention that because the NLRB is considering whether to overturn Purple Communications, via Caesars Entertainment, Board Member Emanuel's participation in Caesars Entertainment is an improper conflict of interest.

Chairman Ring's Response

On Monday, Chairman Ring responded and while he acknowledged the contention made by the Senators, he indicated that at the present time, Board Member Emanuel would not be recused from participating in Caesars Entertainment.  The Chairman noted that Board Member recusals are to be handled by the NLRB's Designated Agency Ethics Officer ("DAEO").  As a result, the Chairman expressed his belief that all Board Members would approach each case with an open mind and indicated that Emanuel would continue to participate in Caesars Entertainment, unless the DAEO found otherwise.




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more