Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Confirmation hearings for a new United States Supreme Court Justice, Brett Kavanaugh, have made headlines this week.  Unfortunately for readers of this blog, Judge Kavanaugh's position on employment and labor law related matters has not taken center stage.  In an effort to remedy that, I want to lead this post off with an article which touches on a wide range of his prior opinions in an effort to predict how he might rule on similar cases, should he be appointed to the Supreme Court.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


How Would a Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh Handle Employment Law Matters?

Readers might have seen some of the confirmation hearings that have occurred this week for President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh.  When President Trump nominated Judge Kavanaugh, currently a Judge on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, earlier this summer, Fisher & Phillips LLP took an in depth look at how Judge Kavanaugh might rule, should he be confirmed to the Supreme Court.  Of all the articles I have come across on Judge Kavanaugh (and his view toward labor & employment law related matters), this is one of the most concise and well thought out articles I have read.  Well worth a review for those looking for an insight into how Judge Kavanaugh might rule, should he be confirmed.


Michigan's Minimum Wage & Tip Credit Hike Raises Concerns Among Employees & Employers Alike

As a follow up to yesterday’s post, Breana Noble at The Detroit News wrote an article this past Monday which addressed widespread concern among both employees and employers in Michigan in regard to a proposed increase in the minimum wage and tip credit in the state.  The current hourly minimum wage rate of $9.25 could go up to $12 by 2022 with the tip credit increasing from $3.52/hour up to $12 by 2024.  However, some employees fear that with these changes, employers will reduce employee work hours in order to cut back on rising labor costs.  As a result, fewer work hours would negatively impact the pocket books of many workers in the state.  On the other hand, many businesses have expressed concern about being able to afford an increase in labor costs and have suggested that layoffs or even closure of their businesses are possible.  Depending on how the Michigan Legislature amends this bill before it becomes law next March, there could potentially be negative consequences, for both employees and employers, that result.


Following Missouri Victory, Right to Work Opponents Turn Eyes to Michigan

This article from The Detroit News notes a rising sense of optimism among labor groups and right to work opponents in Michigan as a result of Democratic nominee for Governor, Gretchen Whitmer, and her plan to repeal the state’s right to work law if elected in November.  Whitmer has made the repeal a major talking point in the campaign so far as she has stated that she intends the repeal the 2013 law.  It is interesting to note that while union membership in the state declined right after the law went into effect, it has apparently rebounded in subsequent years.  Will right to work be a motivating factor for voters in November?  Some legal experts doubt it will be a hot button issue for most voters.  Regardless of who wins the race, however, I would expect either side to claim victory and point to the election results as a de facto referendum on the viability (or lack thereof) of the state’s right to work law.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more