Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Confirmation hearings for a new United States Supreme Court Justice, Brett Kavanaugh, have made headlines this week.  Unfortunately for readers of this blog, Judge Kavanaugh's position on employment and labor law related matters has not taken center stage.  In an effort to remedy that, I want to lead this post off with an article which touches on a wide range of his prior opinions in an effort to predict how he might rule on similar cases, should he be appointed to the Supreme Court.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


How Would a Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh Handle Employment Law Matters?

Readers might have seen some of the confirmation hearings that have occurred this week for President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh.  When President Trump nominated Judge Kavanaugh, currently a Judge on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, earlier this summer, Fisher & Phillips LLP took an in depth look at how Judge Kavanaugh might rule, should he be confirmed to the Supreme Court.  Of all the articles I have come across on Judge Kavanaugh (and his view toward labor & employment law related matters), this is one of the most concise and well thought out articles I have read.  Well worth a review for those looking for an insight into how Judge Kavanaugh might rule, should he be confirmed.


Michigan's Minimum Wage & Tip Credit Hike Raises Concerns Among Employees & Employers Alike

As a follow up to yesterday’s post, Breana Noble at The Detroit News wrote an article this past Monday which addressed widespread concern among both employees and employers in Michigan in regard to a proposed increase in the minimum wage and tip credit in the state.  The current hourly minimum wage rate of $9.25 could go up to $12 by 2022 with the tip credit increasing from $3.52/hour up to $12 by 2024.  However, some employees fear that with these changes, employers will reduce employee work hours in order to cut back on rising labor costs.  As a result, fewer work hours would negatively impact the pocket books of many workers in the state.  On the other hand, many businesses have expressed concern about being able to afford an increase in labor costs and have suggested that layoffs or even closure of their businesses are possible.  Depending on how the Michigan Legislature amends this bill before it becomes law next March, there could potentially be negative consequences, for both employees and employers, that result.


Following Missouri Victory, Right to Work Opponents Turn Eyes to Michigan

This article from The Detroit News notes a rising sense of optimism among labor groups and right to work opponents in Michigan as a result of Democratic nominee for Governor, Gretchen Whitmer, and her plan to repeal the state’s right to work law if elected in November.  Whitmer has made the repeal a major talking point in the campaign so far as she has stated that she intends the repeal the 2013 law.  It is interesting to note that while union membership in the state declined right after the law went into effect, it has apparently rebounded in subsequent years.  Will right to work be a motivating factor for voters in November?  Some legal experts doubt it will be a hot button issue for most voters.  Regardless of who wins the race, however, I would expect either side to claim victory and point to the election results as a de facto referendum on the viability (or lack thereof) of the state’s right to work law.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more