Skip to main content

Breaking: Michigan Legislature Approves Minimum Wage & Paid Leave Legislation


Yesterday, the Republican controlled Michigan House & Senate approved a minimum wage and paid sick leave bill, over the objection of many Democrats in the state’s Legislature.  In order to keep things straight, let us take a closer look at both bills.


Michigan One Fair Wage

This bill will raise the hourly minimum wage rate in the state from $9.25, up to $12 by 2022.  Perhaps one of the more talked about portions of this bill is the fact that tipped workers will also see a pay raise, going from a current hourly rate of $3.52 up to the minimum wage rate by 2024.  Members of the Legislature approved the bill with a 78 - 28 vote.

MI Time to Care

As for the paid sick leave legislation, the proposal would allow employees to earn one hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours worked.  Depending on the size of the employer, employees could have the option to earn up to 9 days of paid sick leave per year.  This bill was also approved with a 78 - 28 vote.


Now for the question that many readers likely have:  Both bills seem to benefit employees so why would many Democrats and labor groups oppose this legislation?  Quite simply, it is because they want voters, rather than the Michigan Legislature, to vote on minimum wage and paid sick leave.  While some Democrats supported the proposals, many more voiced their objections and demanded that voters have the final say, rather than the Legislature.

With that being said, yesterday’s passage takes this matter out of the hands of voters and puts control solely with the Legislature. Given that Republicans have majority control of the state’s House & Senate, both bills do not require the signature of the Governor and will instead go into effect automatically next March.  However, in this particular case, Republicans can amend either or both bills with a simple majority vote by the House & Senate (which they currently have) prior to the legislation becoming law.  This means that it is possible that either bill approved yesterday could look drastically different before they take effect in March.  While no specific amendments have been announced as of yet, it is worth noting that yesterday, House Speaker Tom Leonard, Republican from DeWitt, stated that he thought both bills were poorly written and needed revisions.  Read into that what you want, but if I were a betting man, I think it is more than likely we will see amendments made in the coming months.

Had voters had a say this November (and the Legislature not approved any bills beforehand), any changes to the legislation by the Michigan Legislature would have required a three fourths majority vote.  A simple majority vote is one thing; a three fourths majority vote is a whole other animal.  Perhaps even more concerning for Democrats and labor groups is the fact that should Republicans lose majority control of either the House or Senate in November, Republicans could still amend either bill during a lame duck legislative session.

For the time being, minimum wage and paid sick leave advocates have reason to be cautiously optimistic given yesterday’s vote.  That is, unless Republicans decide to do something before March...


For additional information:  https://www.google.com/amp/s/articles.mlive.com/news/index.ssf/2018/09/minimum_wage_hike_paid_sick_le.amp

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations