Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


With a short week after New Year’s and having to be in court three days this week, I unfortunately had little time to read through many articles.  With that being said, perhaps I should call this a labor law focused post, given the two labor law articles I highlighted below.  I point readers in particular to the article about a county in Delaware considering whether to approve a local right to work ordinance.  Something tells me we are likely to see another year ahead filled with right to work developments across the country, both at the statewide and local levels.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


NLRB General Counsel Issues Memo Impacting Two Major Areas in Labor Law

Recently, the National Labor Relations Board Board General Counsel, Peter Robb, issued a memorandum that outlined several changes that will impact employers and employees alike.  The first major change deals with the NLRB’s deferral policy which allowed the deferral of unfair labor disputes to an agreed upon arbitrator (which promoted administrative efficiencies).  This policy had been ‘amended’ in 2012 to limit what matters could be deferred.  Robb’s memorandum will revert the deferral policy back to how it was originally construed before 2012 and make the deferral policy more broad.  The second major change outlined in Robb’s memorandum clarified that default language will no longer be required in an NLRB settlement agreement.  Prior to Robb’s memorandum, default language was required to be included in all NLRB settlement agreements that stipulated if the charged party (normally the employer) violated the agreement, then the charged party would consent to a default judgment against it in relation to the underlying labor allegations.  This is yet another example of the NLRB’s continued shift over the past year to more employer friendly policies.


Delaware County Delays Vote On Right to Work

Kevin Mooney at The Daily Signal noted earlier this week that the Sussex County Council has delayed a vote on a local right to work ordinance until at least January 9th to allow the county attorney to provide a formal opinion on the matter.  This delayed vote follows a public hearing in which union supporters apparently showed up in force to protest the possible right to work measure.  While Delaware allows local right to work ordinances (and another county in the state approved right to work legislation recently), Sussex County appears to be taking their time to decide on the matter.  My guess is this one will come down to the wire.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more