Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: Minimum Wage Edition


Given the start of the year and several minimum wage hikes in cities, counties, and states across the country, I think it is fitting to dedicate this post to the topic.  I point readers in particular to the potential ramifications that are starting to come about from the minimum wage hikes, as employers are starting to look for new ways to cut back on rising labor costs.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


An Overview of the Minimum Wage Hike in California

Raul Zermeno wrote a comprehensive overview earlier this week that breaks down the minimum wage hike in California.  While the first increase to the hourly wage went into effect on January 1st of this year, some might not be aware that there will be additional increases to the hourly wage rate every January 1st until 2022.  As Raul notes, to make things even more complicated, the statewide hourly wage rate does not impact higher local minimum wage rates...thus some local ordinances will have higher wage rates than elsewhere in the state.  Confused?  Not sure what rage rate applies for a given area of California?  Refer to Raul's article for more information.



Recently, Red Robin (a popular restaurant chain), announced that it was getting rid of bus boys in its restaurants in an effort to cut back on rising labor costs.  The estimated savings by eliminating this position?  Approximately $8 million this year alone.  This comes on the heals of the chain eliminating expediters (employees that plate food in the kitchen) last year and realizing a savings of nearly $10 million.  I think this sort of job cutting was inevitable as employers struggle to pay rising labor costs.  While some employers have passed these costs along to customers (in the form of higher meals, service charges, etc.), others, such as Red Robin, are simply cutting positions.  Something tells me Red Robin will not be the last company that chooses to go this route...



This article dovetails nicely with the above note on Red Robin cutting positions in an effort to combat rising labor costs.  Dan Walters at The Sacramento Bee wrote an article this past Sunday that posited that with states (namely California) raising minimum wage rates, employers might be starting to turn to automation of positions in an effort to keep labor costs down.  To further the point, Dan points to a McDonalds restaurant that has utilized a robotic kiosk to take orders from customers, Amazon starting to implement automation at its warehouses, and labor intensive positions in the agriculture industry using automation to try to keep labor costs low.  Something tells me that as labor costs continue to rise, employers will continue trying to find more ways to keep these costs low, whether it be through automation or some other cost cutting venture.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more