Skip to main content

Round One: Massachusetts Legislative Committee Set to Consider Statewide $15/Hour Minimum Wage Rate & Paid Leave


Today, the Massachusetts Labor and Workforce Development Committee is expected to hold a hearing on an initiative to boost the statewide minimum wage rate to $15/hour by approximately 2022 and another initiative that would require employers to offer 16 weeks of paid leave for medical reasons or to care for a new baby or family member.

Last year, Raise Up Massachusetts garnered tens of thousands of signatures in support of both initiatives in an effort to get both matters before voters this November.  At this point, it appears the Massachusetts Legislature would have to act on both initiatives by June.  If no action happened, supporters of the initiatives would be required to gather more signatures in order to get the matter before voters in November. 

Minimum Wage Initiative

Some lawmakers have noted that while an increase in the statewide wage rate is likely needed (from its current hourly rate of $11), raising it to $15/hour does little good.  As Representative Hannah Kane (Republican from Shrewsbury Massachusetts) has argued, raising the hourly wage rate to $15/hour does not give workers any additional skills to help them find better work.  Others have pointed out that these increased labor costs would be passed along to local city's and schools which are already working on a shoestring budget.  What effect an increase on the minimum wage would have on these particular employers is one thing to keep in mind...especially since these employers cannot simply raise the cost of a cup of coffee or change prices on their menus (like many employers in the state could do) to offset the increase in labor costs.

However, once recent study has found that in Worcester, approximately 1/3 of all local wage earners (hourly workers) would directly receive a benefit from a statewide wage increase.  With nearby states and cities recently having chosen to raise their hourly minimum wage rates (Rhode Island and New York City come to mind), I would suspect there will be increased pressure on Massachusetts to follow suit.  While $15/hour might not be feasible at this point, I would think it is certainly likely enough support to raise the hourly wage rate above $11.


Paid Leave Initiative

Less has been written about the paid leave proposal so far, with the minimum wage initiative taking up most of the oxygen in the room.  With that being said, do not sleep on this one.  While 16 weeks of paid leave is quite a liberal proposal, Washington state has managed to pass a law that provides for 12 weeks of paid leave (with an option for up to 14 weeks) that begins in 202, New York state has approved 8 weeks of paid leave that begins this year, and Washington D.C. has approved a paid leave measure that will allow up to 8 weeks of paid leave beginning in 2020.  Although 16 weeks of paid leave might not be a reality at this point for workers in Massachusetts, something more in line with what Washington, New York, or Washington D.C. have approved is certainly within the realm of possibility.


For additional information as to the minimum wage initiative:  http://www.telegram.com/news/20180125/central-mass-lawmakers-cautious-on-minimum-wage-raise


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per