Skip to main content

One to Keep An Eye On: $15/Hour Minimum Wage & Paid Leave (Massachusetts)


As with many employment and labor law related cases (and bills) that are being litigated around the country, there are always a few that stand out.  This is one to keep an eye on.


At the end of July, Raise Up Massachusetts announced it would push to put both a $15/hour minimum wage proposal and a paid leave requirement on the ballot next November.

Under the minimum wage proposal, the state's minimum wage would rise to $15/hour by 2022.  The current hourly wage rate, $11/hour, would increase by $1 every year until it reached $15.  Thereafter, the hourly wage rate would increase automatically at the same rate as the cost of living in the state.

In regard to the paid leave plan, workers in the state would receive up to 16 weeks of paid leave to care for a new child or an ill or injured family member (or for needs arising from a family member's military service).  The benefit would be capped at $1,000.00/week.  Of course, the question is always how this leave would be paid.  Under the current proposal, the leave would be paid from a trust fund which would be paid by employers (though employers could require their employees to pay up to half of the required contribution).

Although we are still about 15 months away from voters having the chance to vote on these proposals, this is one to keep a close eye on.  Massachusetts, a rather progressive state, should be applauded for taking paid leave one step further by potentially offering leave for needs arising from a family member's military service.  I cannot recall many paid leave plans which include that provision.  As for the minimum wage proposal, it is certainly possible that could face harsher criticism...but given the successful passage of several minimum wage bills last November, perhaps minimum wage will not be a taboo ballot initiative next year in Massachusetts.


For additional information:  https://www.bizjournals.com/boston/news/2017/07/31/group-to-push-for-expanded-paid-leave-15-minimum.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...