Skip to main content

Could Missouri's Right to Work Law End Up on the 2018 Ballot? Unions Are Certainly Trying


This past February, Missouri Republican Governor Eric Greitens signed a bill that would make Missouri a right to work state.  (The right to work bill would prevent employers from mandating union membership as a condition of employment).

Unsurprisingly, unions were quick to criticize the bill as a job killer with Democrats in the state trying to find ways to stop the implementation of the bill.  The prevailing notion to contest the right to work bill was to collect enough signatures to get the matter on the 2018 ballot.  Although only 100,000 notarized signatures are needed to force a vote, it was recently announced that 300,000 signatures had been gathered to support putting the right to work measure on the 2018 ballot for voters to decide upon.  (It is always a good idea to get more signatures than necessary as many signatures are often contested, illegible, signed by people not registered to vote in the state, etc.  As a result, if more signatures are submitted than what is required, it limits some of the risk if certain signatures are excluded.  In this instance, it looks like opponents of the right to work bill went above and beyond to make sure they compiled enough signatures to force a vote).

If opponents of the right to work bill are successful, right to work will be put on hold in the state until the outcome of the vote next year.  However, if it is determined that 100,000 valid signatures were not submitted, the bill is set to take effect on August 28th.  It is expected that the signatures will be submitted to the Missouri Secretary of State tomorrow.  

Not to be outdone, however, there has been approximately $600,000.00 contributed recently to political action committees that are working to ensure a smooth implementation of the right to work bill.  Whether this money is sufficient to hold off the ballot initiative that unions are seeking is hard to say, although perhaps this money would be better spent on an expected 2018 fight should this matter go before voters.  I would expect the months leading up to that vote to be quite costly and likely very contentious.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more