Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


With the 4th of July holiday this week, I would like to say I spent half the week on a beach or poolside with a drink in hand.  However, a few things at work kept me tied up and required me to be in the office a majority of the week.  However, during a few lunch breaks, I found time to read a couple good articles, in particular one that addresses the sexual harassment workplace issues continuing to face Fox.  The article from The Los Angeles Times gives a good context to the matter (and perhaps should give employers a reason to examine their own workplace culture to limit similar issues).

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Fox Terminates Its Head of Sports Programming Over Sexual Harassment Allegations

Recently, Fox terminated its head of sports programming, Jamie Horowitz, after initial investigations had been launched over allegations of sexual harassment in the company's sports division.  Horowitz, who had been a major player in the company's Fox Sports wing, claimed to have been taken by surprise over the abrupt termination.  As Meg James at The Los Angeles Times writes (and readers are likely aware), Fox has been struggling to deal with a sexual harassment scandal within its Fox News division for the better part of a year.  Perhaps this was a situation where executives at Fox saw the potential for additional exposure and bad press if they did not act immediately to deal with Horowitz's alleged misconduct, given the scandal at Fox News has engulfed that division.  Whether this immediate termination will prove to have been the proper course of action for Fox to take is still anyone's guess without more information being known at this time.  

With that being said, these initial investigations and interviews that Fox conducted after being alerted to the alleged misconduct should give employers reason to pause:  If an initial investigation establishes an employee acted inappropriately, broke company rules/regulations, etc., and additional exposure to the employer exists if they do not take immediate action to correct the misconduct, it might be prudent to remedy the problem at once.


How Long Will The Tight Job Market Last For Select Workers?

One of the more thought provoking articles that I have read in some time comes from Don Lee over at The Los Angeles Times with his article addressing how long the tight job market might last (which has been shown to benefit disabled workers, felons, and others who are hard to employ).  As Lee points out, as the U.S. enters its ninth year of economic expansion, the low unemployment numbers and tightening labor market have opened doors for a wide variety of workers.  In his article, Lee identifies a worker in L.A. who has been in and out of prison over the last 20 years but has recently found stable work and is pursuing a healthcare peer specialist position (given the increased need for workers in a variety of fields).  As mentioned, the question is how long this favorable job market will exist...at some point, the bubble will burst and these workers will struggle to find a position.  But for the time being, as Lee writes, work abounds.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per