Skip to main content

Washington Legislators Pass Expansive Paid Leave Plan


Yesterday, Washington Governor Jay Inslee signed a bill into law which makes Washington the fifth state to guarantee paid family leave.  Beginning in 2020, the bill offers eligible employees 12 weeks of paid time off for the birth or adoption of a child or for the serious medical condition of the worker or the worker's family member.  Taking it one step further, the bill allows for 16 weeks of paid time off for a combination of both.  In addition, eligible employees may use an additional 2 weeks if there is a serious health condition with a pregnancy.

Of course, there are some details that employers and employees in the state should note.  Employees must work at least 820 hours before they qualify for the paid leave.  In addition, both employers and employees will pay into the system (to help fund the paid leave) and weekly benefits will be calculated based upon a percentage of the employee's wages and the state's weekly average wage (currently at $1,082.00).  However, the weekly amount paid out would be capped at $1,000.00/week.  For those employees who earn less than the state average, they would receive 90% of their income.  Although for those self employed individuals who elect for coverage will only be required to pay the employee share of the premiums.

For those employers with 50 or fewer employees, this bill exempts them from paying the employer share.  As for employers in the state that already offer paid leave, they will be allowed to opt out, so long as their paid leave plans are equivalent to this new program.

It goes without saying that Washington has certainly taken a giant leap to the forefront of the paid leave discussion.  Employers who were (or maybe still are) worried about how expansive this paid leave plan is will at least have a few years to coordinate things and ensure compliance with the bill.  Beginning January 1, 2019, premiums of .4% of wages will start to be collected with .63% paid by employees and .37% paid by employers.

As always, it will be interesting to see if this move by Washington pushes any other states to pass similar paid leave legislation...


 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more