Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: Paid Leave Edition


The past week or so has certainly proven to be an eventful time in Washington (the state, not D.C.).  In between news of the passage of a paid leave bill along with the Washington Supreme Court holding no strict liability exists for a missed employee meal break, there has certainly been a lot to talk about.  Given the tenor on both sides of the aisle over paid leave as of late, I think it is appropriate to highlight a few articles on both paid leave and sick leave in able for readers to get a better grasp on where things stand nationwide on the matter.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.



Jessica Smith wrote an article on Wednesday in which she proposed the idea that if employers offered paid leave, they would in turn fill more open positions.  Of course it is not a stretch to think that the better the compensation package that is offered by employers, the more likely it is they will attract candidates to an open position.  However, as some research has shown, female labor participation in the workforce could rise by 6% if access to childcare and paid leave were available.  Critics of paid leave are quick to point out that providing this leave raises the cost of employment and places a financial burden on employers.  Although there is likely no solution here that would make all parties happy, with some states starting to pass paid leave policies of their own, I think we are coming closer and closer to having the support for making national paid leave a reality.



On Tuesday, the Metro Civil Service Commission voted unanimously to provide paid family leave to full time Metro government employees that have spent at least six months with Metro.  Under this approved plan, which went into effect immediately after Tuesday's vote, eligible employees will be offered six weeks of paid leave for those employees who have given birth to a child, adopted a child, or are caring for a seriously ill spouse, parent, or child.  Of note, this plan provides both maternity and paternity leave.


A Closer Look at a CEO's Response to an Employee Using Sick Leave For Mental Health

Earlier this week, I was paging through a couple articles on paid leave and came across this great article from USA Today that discussed an employee's decision to use sick leave for mental health reasons (and how the CEO reacted positively to the decision).  As the article notes, the employee decided to use two days of sick leave for her mental health so she could come back the next week refreshed and at 100%.  Perhaps surprising some readers, the CEO championed the employee for this decision and thanked her for calling attention to the stigma surrounding mental health in the workplace.  While not all employers offer leave for employees dealing with mental health matters (and I am not necessarily suggesting that this should be something that all employers provide, for that matter), I think the CEO's thoughtful acknowledgment of the employee's situation could be a useful tool for all to consider when dealing with a similar situation/employee request.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more