Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


It was difficult to narrow things down this week as I came across several great articles that I thought readers would appreciate reading.  In particular, I want to highlight the article on USERRA.  Given the ongoing war on terror, I think many employers will continue to be confronted with USERRA issues.  This particular article highlights one of the finer points of that Act.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


EEOC Issues Final Rules for Wellness Programs Under the ADA and GINA

Last month, the EEOC issued a final rule for employer wellness programs under the ADA ("Americans with Disabilities Act") and GINA ("Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act").  The California Labor & Employment Law Blog posted the final rules that I think readers should take a look at.  While this may not impact everyone, it is worth a brief review at the very least.


Reminder: An USERRA Cause of Action Requires An Adverse Employment Action

The Orrick Employment Law and Litigation Blog noted out one of the finer points of the United Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 ("USERRA") in so much that an adverse employment action is required for this cause of action to proceed.  I wanted to highlight this article for that reason (especially as it ties in a recent case out of a District Court in Colorado from earlier this year on the matter) as well as to give readers a reminder of some of the unique aspects of USERRA.


President Obama Signs Into Law The Defend Trade Secrets Act

The Non-Compete and Trade Secrets Report recently wrote a thorough article on the passage of The Defend Trade Secrets Act that President Obama signed into law.  As a result of the passage of this Act, for the first time, there will be a federal private right of action for misappropriation of trade secrets.  This is a huge development and something that readers should note!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more