Skip to main content

Reminder: Hourly Wages Set to Go Up on July 1 for Los Angeles Area Employees


Los Angeles area employers and employees likely are aware that in less than a month, a raise in the minimum wage rate will occur.  For those that are not aware or simply forgot, take note!

On July 1, 2016, Los Angeles City or County employers with 26 or more employees will be required to pay an hourly rate of $10.50.  For those employers with 25 or fewer employees (or non-profits with 26 or more employees that have approval to pay a deferred rate), the minimum wage increase will be deferred for a year.  The hourly rate will continue to rise every July 1 thereafter for several years until it reaches $15.00/hour.  

Of course, the question arises of what kind of penalties will be put in place for a violation of this new ordinance.  An employer who violates the ordinance is liable to the employee for payment of back wages and an additional penalty of $100/each day the violation occurred (or continued).  Note, there are also administrative fines that will apply to each violation as well.

In addition, there are also notice requirements that employers must follow.  The Ordinance requires that employers post in a clearly visible at any workplace or job site where employees work, a notice published every year by the Los Angeles Wage Enforcement Division.  (See the link below for a copy of the most recent notice).  As many would expect, notices must be translated if at least 5% of the workplace or job site speaks a different language.  (Again, the link below includes copies of the notice in several languages).

It is important for employers (and employees) to stay up to date and track any changes that might occur as a result of this new Ordinance.  With minimum wage at the forefront of a lot of employment law related discussion recently, I would expect enforcement of this Ordinance to be strong.


For additional information:  http://wagesla.lacity.org/#information

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...