Skip to main content

Breaking: Washington D.C. to Raise Minimum Wage Rate to $15/Hour


Yesterday, it was announced that lawmakers in the District of Columbia had unanimously approved a measure to raise the minimum wage in the District from the current hourly wage rate of $10.50 to $15.00 by 2020.  Note, this increase will impact approximately 77,000 hourly workers in he District.  While the hourly wage rate was already set to go to $11.50 this July, this approved measure will raise the hourly wage rate by about $.70 over the next few years.  As with other states and cities that have approved minimum wage hikes, once the hourly wage rate hits $15/hour in 2020, further increases will be automatic and tied to inflation.  

It goes without saying that is a huge development on the minimum wage front.  After both New York and California approved $15/hour wage rates across both states earlier this year, Washington D.C. jumps in as one of the 'leaders' at the forefront of this issue.

Although, note, that for tipped workers, the hourly wage rate will only go up to $5/hour from the current rate of $2.77/hour for the same period as non-tipped workers.  As before, employers will be responsible for making up the difference if a tipped employee's base pay doesn't not meet the minimum wage rate.  Unsurprisingly, some on the members of the D.C. Council expressed regret that there will remain two tiers of hourly pay.  However, I question whether a flat $15/hour wage rate for ALL workers would have had enough support to pass.  Something tells me the answer is a resounding 'no'.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more