Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: Minimum Wage Edition


I came across a lot of great articles this week, especially in regard to minimum wage issues.  Given that Halloween is tomorrow, I thought this would be a good time to highlight some articles on the topic.  It really is a 'trick or treat':  a trick for a lot of employers are terrified of impending minimum wage increases, but a treat for employees who have been fighting (and continue to fight) for an increase in their hourly pay.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


Where Do Republican Presidential Candidates Stand on Federal Minimum Wage Rate of $7.25/hour?

Katie Little over at MSNBC has a good overview of where each of the Republican Presidential candidates stand on the federal minimum wage rate of $7.25/hour.  Unsurprisingly, the majority of candidates either do not support raising the federal minimum wage rate or only doing so if the wage rate increase is "reasonable".  Still worth a quick read through to get a feel for where the candidates stand on the issue.


Food Workers for San Francisco Airport to Receive Minimum Wage Hike

Earlier this month, the Airport Commission in San Fransisco voted unanimously to expand the airport's minimum wage rules to include off site laborers that assemble in flight meals for airlines at the airport.  Workers that prepare these meals offsite work in location where the airport's minimum wage rates did not previously apply.  However, these workers will go from an average hourly rate of pay of $10.50 to $13.52 per hour.  As has been noted by supporters of the Fight for $15 movement, this is a step in the right direction to get these workers to an hourly wage rate of $15.00.



Ashley Gross has an interesting note on Citizens' Initiative Measure No. 1, a ballot initiative that Tacoma voters will decide upon next week.  If passed, Measure No. 1 would raise the hourly wage rate to $15.00 per hour for businesses with annual revenue of more than $300,000.00.  This change would go into effect in early December.  For those who might remember, Seattle's $15.00 per hour minimum wage rate will go into effect in 2017 for the earliest businesses impacted by the new law.  A competing measure, Tacoma City Council Initiative Measure No. 1B would phase in a $12.00 per hour minimum wage rate by 2018.


Oregon Chapter of the AFL-CIO Supports $15.00/Hour

Earlier this week, the Oregon chapter of the AFL-CIO gave its support to a ballot measure that would increase Oregon's minimum wage rate to $15.00 per hour.  At its recent convention, The Statesman Journal noted that this chapter of the labor union voted unanimously to support Oregonians for 15.  Whether this support of a ballot measure to increase the minimum wage has any impact is still unclear, but something tells me that the minimum wage rate will stands a shot at increasing in the sate in the not too distant future.  (Another ballot measure has also been proposed to increase the minimum wage rate to $13.50).


Minimum Wage Increase Could Be Coming for Lexington Workers

Recently, the Lexington, Kentucky council voted to place a three year phased in $10.10 minimum wage increase on the docket.  It is important to note that this was a divided vote and only the first hurdle that had to be cleared to raise the minimum wage rate.  



Lydia DePillis has a good note on the Service Employees International Union's 80,000 member strong United Healthcare Workers local in California that has begun an initial foray into the upcoming minimum wage increase votes in 2016.  Recently, this union has started to fund the 'Fairness Project', an organization that is working to boost minimum wage ballot measures around the country.  At this point, the Fairness Project only has "a couple million" on hand to push ballot measures across the country.  It goes without saying that if this organization (and the union) want to push ballot measures around the country, it is going to take more money to really have an impact.  Well worth keeping an eye on over the coming year.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more