Skip to main content

New Laws for 2015: Wage Statement Violations (CA)


Recently, California Governor Jerry Brown signed into law AB 1506 which provides California employers with a bit of leeway to fix any wage statement violations before a suit can be brought under California's Private Attorneys General Pact ("PAGA").  Under California law, specific information must be included on an employee's pay stub, such as the name and address of the employer, inclusive dates of the pay period, etc.  If an employer violates this part of the Labor Code in regard to the wage statement, an employee can bring suit under the PAGA.  

Under this new law, an employer is now given a limited right to cure certain wage statement violations.  Note, this right to cure is limited to alleged violations of Labor Code section 226(a)(6) and (8).  The law now gives employers 33 days from the postmark date of the notice of a violation to issue a fully compliant pay stub to all aggrieved employees for each pay period for the 3 year period preceding the postmark date of the notice.  Once the employer has cured the violation, written notice (via certified mail) must be given to the complaining employee and the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency that the violation has been cured.  

Assuming the violation has actually been cured, the employee cannot file a claim for penalties against the employer.  However, employers take note:  this right to cure can only be used within any 12 month period for the same violation(s) alleged in the notice, regardless of the location of the worksite!  Even though this is somewhat of a "free pass" that employers are now afforded, it is not a "get out of jail free" card that can be routinely used time and time again.


For additional information:  http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/news/2015/10/05/new-law-will-give-employers-a-small-break-on-pay.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more