Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: Labor Law Edition


This was a great week where I found some time to read through several great articles, many on labor law related topics.  Given the increase of NLRB and labor law related issues in the news over the past few weeks, this is a good time to highlight those matters with a "Labor Law Edition" post.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


NLRB "Ambush" Election Rule Appears To Be Just That, An Ambush

George Miller has a good follow up on the impact of the NLRB "Ambush" Election Rule that recently went into effect earlier this year.  (NLRB "Ambush" Election Becomes a Reality).  As this article notes, the new rule has indeed shortened the time between the date of the filing of an election petition and the date of the actual election.  It goes without saying that this development has given the business community further evidence that this new rule has had an unwanted positive impact on union votes...and an incentive to be more proactive in their efforts to start campaigns to remain a non-union workplace.   


Senator Accuses NLRB and OSHA of Coordinated Effort to Change the Law

Senator Lamar Alexander of Tennessee recently accused the NLRB and OSHA of conspiring to change corporate liability law during a recent hearing.  The Senator pointed to the fact that OSHA officials apparently began instructing their regional directors to use the same "joint employer" standard that the NLRB adopted, one day before the NLRB released its ruling in the relevant case.  Unsurprisingly, Senator Alexander also recently introduced legislation to overturn the NLRB's new "joint employer" standard.  Time will tell if his attempts to link the NLRB and OSHA together (or undo the new "joint employer" standard) will actually gain any traction.



The Washington Post posted a good article and noted the success of the 'Summit on Worker Voice' that the White House hosted earlier this month.  (White House's 'Summit on Worker Voice' Set For October 7th).  At the Summit, President Obama discussed the importance of workers being "rewarded properly for the labor they put in...".  Other labor supporters, including House Democrats that attended the Summit, produced a report that showed the benefits of unions in the workplace as further evidence that giving workers a voice and a seat at the table has positive results for all involved.  Beyond simply getting good press for fighting for the middle class and involving a blue collar workforce in a spirited discussion, this Summit allowed President Obama to continue his efforts of putting labor issues at the forefront and giving unions a voice.  


Hillary Clinton Lends Support to Labor Union Rally in Las Vegas

Earlier this week, Hillary Clinton made an unannounced appearance at a labor union rally on Fashion Show Drive in Las Vegas (near Donald Trump's hotel) to lend support to the protesters and advocate for their right to organize and right to a minimum wage.  While Trump's hotel in Las Vegas has a no-union policy, the Culinary Union has been fighting for over a year to unionize workers at the hotel.  Now that Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker is out of the race, unions are not as much of a focal point of many candidates.  That is what makes Clinton's unscheduled visit all the more surprising.


Senator Bernie Sanders Proposes New Labor Union Bill

Last week, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders announced his support of the Workplace Democracy Act which would protect employees who seek to form unions.  Given that Democrats typically receive the support of labor unions in general elections (and the fact that Sanders is fighting to get traction with Hillary running), this is a bold move to court union votes.  The Guardian article has some good insight into the uphill fight Sanders might face to win over these union votes.  Time will tell if it pays off, but Sanders is certainly playing to a traditionally Democratic base.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more