Skip to main content

New Laws for 2015: Fair Pay Act (CA)


Recently, California Governor Jerry Brown signed into law SB 358, which bars California employers from paying women less than men when they both do "substantially similar work."  As the language of the new law reads, this Fair Pay Act is one of the tougher equal pay measures to go into effect anywhere in the country.  

Under the new law, employers are prohibited from preventing workers from discussing their own wages or the wages of co-workers if the purpose is to determine pay fairness.  In addition, the Act prevents employers from retaliating or discriminating against employees who seek out pay disparity information.  In essence, California employees are now free to talk amongst themselves and do their own research to determine whether they are receiving fair pay...without the threat of the employer taking action against them.

Interesting to note, the bill received the unanimous support of the Senate in California and only had two dissenting votes in the Assembly.  In an employee friendly state like California, this is not too surprising.  The fact that the California Chamber of Commerce jumped on board in support of the bill shows that there has been wide spread support among business oriented groups, which is something that does not always happen with a pro-employee bill like this. 

The author of the bill, Hanna-Beth Jackson of Santa Barbara, indicated this new law could be a template for other states (or even cities) to use to want to pass similar gender pay-gap bills.  Whether other states will follow suit remains to be seen...but once again, California has become one of the fore bearers on the issue and signed into law another employee friendly piece of legislation.


For additional information:  http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Jerry-Brown-signs-nation-s-toughest-gender-6554023.php

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Distance in a Non-Compete Agreement Measured "As the Crow Flies"

Ginn v. Stonecreek Dental Care - Court of Appeals, Twelfth Appellate District of Ohio Facts :  Dr. R. Douglas Martin ("Martin") sold his dental practice to an employee who worked there, Dr. David Ginn ("Ginn").  In doing so, Martin and Ginn signed a contract for the sale which contained a non-compete provision that prohibited Martin from engaging in business "within 30 miles" of the practice for five years starting from October 2010.  While Martin initially stayed on and worked with Ginn for a period, the relationship subsequently deteriorated between the two and Martin went to work for another dental office.  The new dental office was less than 30 miles away when measuring the distance in a straight line.  However, when driving between the offices, the distance was more than 30 miles. Ginn filed a claim against Martin on the grounds that Martin breached the non-compete.   At the trial court level, the court found that "within 30 miles"...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...
Post a Comment
Read more