Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


It was a busy week getting back from vacation and playing catchup, but I still found some time to read through some good articles and blog posts.  In particular, pay attention to the article on what wage deductions cannot be made by employers in California.  It is a very interesting, even for those employers and employees not in California.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


Wage Deductions that California Employers Cannot Make

Employers beware, under California law, there are certain wage deductions that cannot be made from an employee's pay.  As the article notes, some might be somewhat common sense.  For instance, many states, including California, have laws in place that bar an employer from making wage deductions for business expenses.  However, as this article notes, one of the nuances of prohibited wage deductions in California include a ban that employers cannot require applicants or employees to submit a photograph without paying the cost for the applicant or employee.  Well worth a read!


Reductions in Force? A Few Tips for Managing the Situation

Daniel Fassio has some good tips for employers that are going through reductions in force.  As Daniel notes, it is never an easy situation for anyone involved, but this article provides some good pointers that employers should note.


FaceBook & the Workplace

I included this article because it does not deal with the typical discussion of whether an employee should use FaceBook while at work.  Instead, this article delves into whether or not employees should write social media posts about their jobs, co-employees, clients, etc.  I think the title of the article gets it right:  "FaceBook is Not Your Friend at Work".  Employees, remember that.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...