Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: Paid Paternity Leave Edition


It is a shorter week in the office with the a lot of traveling for work, but with that being said, I actually still found some time to do a little reading.  

This week I found several great articles on paid paternity leave.  In recent weeks, I have seen more and more attention paid to this matter.  Given the increased attention to the lack of mandatory paid paternity leave in the United States, I think it is appropriate to dedicate this post to the topic.

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.



CBS News has a great article on the stigma that is attached to the idea of men taking parental leave to care for newborns.  This particular article notes an employee who works for PriceWaterhouseCoopers in Chicago who was able to take 6 weeks of paid paternal leave to care for his newly adopted son.  It is interesting to read through the article and see how there is a certain level of surprise (and maybe even disdain) for new fathers who take paternal leave after the birth or adoption of a child.  For years, men taking this time off was unheard of...but as times change and many men play an increased role in the development and care of their young children, it has become more and more common for paternal leave to become "normal".  Like the Huffington Post article listed below in regard to Nestle, it is interesting to note that while 71 countries offer paid leave for new fathers, the United States has yet to join this list...



This is the first Huffington Post article that caught my eye this week.  Although short, it has a good summary of why TOMS founder Blake Mycoskie believes dads need paid paternity leave in the United States.  In part because of his experience taking 12 weeks of paternity leave, TOMS now grants all new parent employees eight weeks of paid leave and flexible schedules upon return to work.  Similar to the story of Nestle, below, while mandatory paid paternity leave is not required in the United States yet, several companies are jumping ahead of the game and being proactive about the matter. 


There has been a fair amount of discussion the past few weeks/months about whether there should be paid parental leave for workers in the United States.  Many overseas countries already have these types of policies in place...naturally, workers in this country have started to clamor for the same.  Shira Schoenberg has a good overview of how Boston and the entire state of Massachusetts have started to take steps to provide paid parental leave to employees...following the lead of California, New Jersey, and Rhode Island.  This is one to keep an eye on.



In recent weeks, Nestle announced it would offer 14 weeks of paid maternity leave for primary caretakers and an additional 12 weeks of unpaid leave as well.  For new fathers, Nestle will give them one paid week of paternity leave if they are not the primary caretaker.  Interesting to note, the company indicated it changed its leave policy to "improve the lives of its workers".  Interesting to note, as well, the Huffington Post article points out that the United States is the only advanced economy that does not offer some kind of paid leave...and instead only guarantees 12 weeks of unpaid leave to those workers who work for companies with 50 or more employees.



In early June, Richard Branson, founder of Virgin Group, announced a change in company policy in which new parents could take up to 52 weeks of paid parental leave at 100% pay.  (Richard Branson's Paid Parental Leave Announcement).  This is great press and publicity and certainly pushes the paid parental leave discussion to the forefront.  However, as Forbes notes, there are some "catches" in this new policy, namely:  the policy applies to fewer than 140 employees in London and Geneva (of a worldwide group of 50,000 employees) and employees are eligible for the 100% pay for 52 weeks only if they have worked for Virgin for at least four years, among other caveats.  Even when looking closer at the new policy, and seeing its limits, this is still a major victory for those pushing for paid parental leave on a larger scale.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more