Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


I read through a lot of good articles this week, especially from some of the blogs I routinely follow.  One of my favorites was on a recent EEOC suit against UPS in regard to the company's prohibition on beards and hair rules.  That article is certainly well worth a quick read!

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


Older Workers Benefit Protection Act: Nice Try Hershey Managers

Joanna Bowers has a somewhat humorous article on several former Hershey's managers who were terminated in 2009 and 2010, accepted severance pay and waived their claims against the company, then turned around and tried to sue Hershey's for age discrimination.  This is a good article that deals with issues surrounding the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act...and provides a thorough breakdown of why the managers' age discrimination claim failed.



When I want to review some of the finer points of California's Paid Sick Leave Law, I often turn to the California Employment Law Report.  This week was no exception as Anthony Zaller gave readers five major amendments to California's Paid Sick Leave Law that employers and employees should note.  As noted, these amendments apply going forward, after being signed into law by Governor Jerry Brown on July 13, 2015.  


EEOC Brings Suit Against UPS Over Beard & Hair Rules

Another good article from Joe Lustig, with this particular one focusing on a recent suit filed by the EEOC against UPS in relation to the company's policy that prohibits male employees in customer contact or supervisory positions from having bears or growing hair below collar length.  The EEOC alleged that UPS has failed to hire or promote individuals whose religious practices conflict with the company's appearance policy.  As well, the EEOC alleged that UPS failed to provide religious accommodations to its appearance policy.  This case is in the early stages, but it is certainly one to keep an eye on.


Department of Labor Issues "Administrator Interpretations" in Regard to Independent Contractors

Recently, the Department of Labor ("DOL") released "Administrator Interpretations" and weighed in on the test for whether someone is an independent contractor or an employee.  In essence, as the Interpretations note, the DOL finds that most workers are employees under the FLSA.  This article breaks down the Interpretations well and walks readers through some of the finer points of this issue.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more