Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


Union elections during the coronavirus pandemic have been somewhat of a hot button issue for some.  While I wanted to highlight a couple good articles this week, an article from Politico on mounting pressure to move union elections to an online only format is one particular article well worth a deep dive. 

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.



Eleanor Mueller at Politico wrote a good article yesterday evening in which she noted that both Democrats and labor unions have started to increase their calls for union elections to be conducted online rather than in person.  It should come to no surprise to readers that the National Labor Relations Board has been dealing with how to effectively conduct union elections during the coronavirus pandemic.  While union elections are currently allowed and taking place, Democrats and labor unions have objected on the grounds that in person elections risk the safety of those who show up to vote.  Moving the elections online removes the potential risk to voters, as the argument goes, while still allowing elections to take place.  Critics of this online election procedure are quick to point out that it would be ripe with fraud and potential manipulation.  I refer you to Mueller’s article for more information on the matter.


$15/Hour Minimum Wage Rate Expected to See Another Push

With the upcoming Presidential election in a few months, there is widespread speculation that there will soon be another push to increase the federal minimum wage rate to $15/hour.  Melissa Repko at CNBC recently wrote that with presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden voicing his support for the higher hourly wage rate and some members of Congress expecting tough fights to hold (or gain) Congressional seats, voters might see a candidate’s support (or lack thereof) as a key point on how to vote in November.  With many employers having adopted an increase in pay rates for some employees during the coronavirus pandemic, now might be the time to strike while a growing portion of the (voting) public seems to find higher wage rates to be more palatable.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per