Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


While I thought I had a busy week, it was nothing compared to the pace of the U.S. Supreme Court.  As readers might have seen, the nation’s highest court issued two decisive rulings in relation to employment law matters earlier this week.  I will refer readers to the two posts from earlier this week, but make no mistake, those cases will likely be considered paramount when looking back at relevant cases from the Supreme Court’s term.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.



This week, it was announced that a task force created by the presumptive 2020 Democratic nominee for President, Joe Biden, and Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders was working on the framework for the party’s platform headed into party’s convention next month.  That platform is expected to include a call to increase to the federal hourly minimum wage rate to $15/hour, guarantee workers the right to join a union and bargain collectively, allow card check elections, and do away with right to work laws across the country.  While much of a party’s platform is a “wishlist” of ideas and goals for a potential administration, it does signal the potential policy objectives that are sought to be accomplished if that party’s nominee is elected.



A few weeks ago, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its landmark decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia in which the Court expanded Title VII protections to LGBTQ workers.  Given that over half the states did not recognize these protections for LGBTQ workers, prior to the Bostock decision, it is imperative that employers ensure they are now in compliance with this decision.  Next Tuesday, there is going to be a webinar in which the impact of the Bostock decision will be discussed along with pointers provided on how employers can ensure they take steps to not run afoul of this ruling.  For those that have the time next Tuesday afternoon, I think this webinar would be worth checking out.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations