Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week


While I thought I had a busy week, it was nothing compared to the pace of the U.S. Supreme Court.  As readers might have seen, the nation’s highest court issued two decisive rulings in relation to employment law matters earlier this week.  I will refer readers to the two posts from earlier this week, but make no mistake, those cases will likely be considered paramount when looking back at relevant cases from the Supreme Court’s term.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.



This week, it was announced that a task force created by the presumptive 2020 Democratic nominee for President, Joe Biden, and Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders was working on the framework for the party’s platform headed into party’s convention next month.  That platform is expected to include a call to increase to the federal hourly minimum wage rate to $15/hour, guarantee workers the right to join a union and bargain collectively, allow card check elections, and do away with right to work laws across the country.  While much of a party’s platform is a “wishlist” of ideas and goals for a potential administration, it does signal the potential policy objectives that are sought to be accomplished if that party’s nominee is elected.



A few weeks ago, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its landmark decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia in which the Court expanded Title VII protections to LGBTQ workers.  Given that over half the states did not recognize these protections for LGBTQ workers, prior to the Bostock decision, it is imperative that employers ensure they are now in compliance with this decision.  Next Tuesday, there is going to be a webinar in which the impact of the Bostock decision will be discussed along with pointers provided on how employers can ensure they take steps to not run afoul of this ruling.  For those that have the time next Tuesday afternoon, I think this webinar would be worth checking out.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...