Skip to main content

Happening Today: Nevada’s Hourly Minimum Wage Rate Increases


Effective today, July 1st, the hourly minimum wage rate in Nevada is set to increase as follows:  rising to $8/hour if the employer offers qualifying health benefits and rising to $9/hour if the employer does not offer qualifying health benefits.

Readers might be wondering, “Ok, and what exactly is a “qualifying health benefit” in Nevada?”  In order to answer that question, we need to look at a Nevada Supreme Court case from 2018, MDC Restaurants, LLC v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court.  In that case, the Nevada Supreme Court held that under the Minimum Wage Amendment Act (which provides for the two tier minimum wage setup in the state), an employer who pays one dollar per hour less in wages must provide a benefit in the form of health insurance that is at least equivalent to the one dollar per hour in wages that the employee would otherwise receive.

The Nevada Legislature stepped in afterward and passed Senate Bill 192 in 2019 to clarify that an employer may pay the lower minimum wage rate if health benefits were available to the employee and the employee’s dependents in a health benefit plan that included:

  • Ambulatory patient services
  • Emergency services
  • Hospitalization
  • Maternity and newborn care
  • Mental health and substance use disorder services
  • Prescription drugs
  • Rehabilitative and habilitative services and devices
  • Laboratory services
  • Preventative and wellness services and chronic disease management
  • Pediatric services
  • Any other health care service or coverage level required to be included in an individual or group health benefit plan pursuant to a Nevada statute

This minimum wage hike comes on the heels of Assembly Bill 456 that was passed last year.  Under that legislation, there will be subsequent annual minimum wage increases of $.75/hour through 2024.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more