Skip to main content

What I’ve Been Reading This Week: Work From Home Edition


Yet another week of (work from home) work has come and gone.  With that comes the opportunity to look at a few articles which have taken a deep dive into the dynamics of work from home...both from the perspective of those impacted by the large number of workers that are currently working remotely as well as from the viewpoint of the workers themselves.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.



On Monday, Google announced that it was extending the option for most of its employees to work from home through June of 2021.  As The San Francisco Chronicle reports, with many of the company’s employees already working remotely, there has been a noticeable dip in the housing market in the Bay Area, a plunge in leases in the area, and a direct hit to San Francisco’s bars and restaurants.  (With much of the company’s employees being located in the Bay Area, this would undoubtedly be an area severely hampered by having many of Google’s employees not in the office.)   With this announcement of an even longer work from home option being provided to employers, it is somewhat sobering to think of the effect this will continue to have on the Bay Area over the coming months.



Eleanor Cummins at Vox write a recent article which tracked the emergence of work from home as an option for workers from some of its earlier roots in the 1970’s through today.  In the article, attention is paid to large scale employers such as Yahoo, IBM, and FaceBook in an effort to show that while work from home has curtailed in recent years (before the coronavirus pandemic started, only about 14% of workers in the country worked from home five or more days per week), that has taken a sharp reversal.  However, with nearly half the workforce working from home now, the prevalence of distractions from work abound.  Although the article does not give employers or employees a full proof guide on how to cut out the distractions, it does provide a few stories about how some workers are coping that I believe are worth a read.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more