Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


A few good updates were on my radar this week, namely dealing with the right to work legislation working its way through the Missouri Legislature, the Secretary of Labor nominee's delayed hearing, as well as a development on the Harvard student unionization vote.  As a result, I want to keep this update concise and to the point and give readers a bit more information on two major developments on the labor and employment law front from across the country this week.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


With Missouri's Right to Work Bill a Near Certainty, Both Sides Gear Up For the Next Fight

Never let it be said that supporters and opponents of certain pieces of legislation are not forward thinking.  Celeste Blott over at The St. Louis Post-Dispatch wrote an article earlier this week about AFL-CIO President Mike Louis having recently filed petitions for the 2018 ballot that would seek to reverse any right to work legislation that is passed this year.  Not to be outdone, a Missouri nurse and two Kansas City police officers have challenged the petitions on the grounds that they are "insufficient and unfair" and are asking the court to rewrite them with more details about unions, collective bargaining agreements, and the right to work law they would supersede.  Even though Missouri is not a right to work state yet, it appears that both supporters and opponents of the legislation are already planning their next step.


Secretary of Labor's Confirmation Hearing Delayed Again

Earlier this morning, The Boston Globe reported that the confirmation hearing for Andy Puzder, President Trump's nominee for Secretary of Labor, has again been pushed back.  Readers might recall that Puzder's confirmation hearing was originally set for January 12, January 17, and February 2.  As of this writing, Puzder's new confirmation hearing date is now set for February 7.  Several 'pro labor' groups have been outspoken in recent weeks against Puzder and have argued that he is ill suited to become the next Labor Secretary because of his prior history which has tended to be 'pro employer'.  While the Chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions committee (who will hold the confirmation hearings) says the additional delay is so that Puzder can submit required paperwork for review by the Senators beforehand, perhaps there is a more striking reason why Puzder has continued to delay getting this paperwork submitted?  I am not necessarily saying that Puzder is having second thoughts about the position, as mentioned before, but with so many delays in the confirmation hearing, maybe where there is smoke, there is also fire...


Harvard Takes Steps to Dismiss Objection to Unionization Election

Last week, Harvard moved to dismiss objections to the student unionization election that happened recently.  Readers will likely recall the drawn out process that has occurred since the election occurred.  At issue in this matter is a dispute over whether the list of eligible voters in the election, generated by Harvard, improperly excluded some employees who otherwise were qualified to participate.  In its motion to dismiss this particular objection, Harvard argues it properly compiled the list and took steps to ensure that all eligible students were included on the list.  According to the note from The Harvard Crimson, a decision is expected prior to February 21.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more