Skip to main content

One To Keep An Eye On: House Bill 937 (Texas)


As with many employment & labor law related cases (and bills) being litigated around the country, there are always a few that stand out.  This is one to keep an eye on.


Recently, House Bill 937 was introduced in the Texas Legislature and seeks to raise the state's minimum wage rate to $10.10/hour over a five year time frame.  The current hourly wage rate ($7.25/hour) has been in effect since 2009 and minimum wage advocates are aggressively attempting to use this bill to jump start the discussion on a higher hourly wage rate in Texas.  State Representative Safronia Thompson (a Democrat from the Houston area) is championing this piece of legislation after a similar measure she supported in the last legislative session failed to pass.

Note, there are other bills currently circulating in the Legislature which seek to raise the minimum wage rate to $15/hour.  At this point, it is still too early to say whether any of these bills will become law.  I think the only realistic bill that could pass is House Bill 937.  Then again, with Republicans in control of the state Legislature (and a Republican Governor who would have the ability to veto the legislation if it were to pass), I would not necessarily hold my breath that this bill will become a reality.  Then again, if a somewhat conservative state like Arizona can increase its minimum wage rate, maybe there is hope for hourly workers in Texas?  (Although keep in mind that the hourly wage rate in Arizona increased because of a ballot measure this past November...whereas House Bill 937 is only in the hands of a Republican controlled Legislature, not the voters...).


For additional information:  https://www.texasobserver.org/texas-democrats-push-least-10-10-minimum-wage/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...