Skip to main content

One To Keep An Eye On: Berger v. National Collegiate Athletic Association


As with many employment and labor law related cases (and bills) that are being litigated around the country, there are always a few that stand out.  This is one to keep an eye on.


Facts:  In early December, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in regard to a Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") suit brought by former student athletes at the University of Pennsylvania.  The student athletes claimed that they were "employees", in accordance with the FLSA, and therefore were entitled to minimum wage as a result of their participation in the women's track and field team while at the university.  As a result, the former student athletes argued they were not paid for their "work" in violation of the FLSA. 

The Seventh Circuit issued a ruling from three judges on the bench and dismissed the FLSA suit on the ground that student athletes who voluntarily play sports for a college does not entitle the students to being classified as "employees" under the FLSA.  Therefore, the Court held these student athletes did not have a valid claim for minimum wage under the FLSA.

Issue:  Are student athletes who perform "work" for a university ("work" in this case being defined as participating in a collegiate sports team) actually "employees" and therefore entitled to be paid minimum wage in accordance with the FLSA?

Current Status:  On December 16, a petition for rehearing was filed in which the student athletes asked for an en ban rehearing.  In the petition, the student athletes claim the opinion from the three judges on the bench conflicted with prior caselaw and improperly relied upon non regulatory guidelines.  At this time, no ruling has been made on the petition for rehearing nor have any hearings been set on the matter.

Looking Ahead:  Assuming the Seventh Circuit agrees to rehear the matter, I would be surprised if a different ruling was reached.  For those curious, give the original December 5th opinion a further review.  I think the three judges who issued the opinion tracked the matter relatively well and pointed to the inefficiencies that the student athletes had (namely being able to establish, at a minimum, that they were "employees" under the FLSA).  I would not hold my breath on this one, for those hoping for a different outcome.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more