Skip to main content

Breaking: Two Lawsuits Filed to Challenge the Department of Labor's Overtime Pay Rule


Although I had already posted an article earlier this morning, this breaking development out of Texas is too important to not write about immediately.


Earlier today, two lawsuits were filed to challenge the new overtime rules.  The first suit was brought by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.  The second was brought by several business groups and officials from 21 states.  Both suits were filed in federal court in the Eastern District of Texas to challenge the Department of Labor's new overtime rules set to take effect December 1.  (The 21 states include Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, and Wisconsin).  For those needing a refresher, under the new overtime rules, employers would be required to pay overtime to any salaried worker that earns less than $47,500/year.  (Note, that threshold is double the current minimum rate of $23,660/year.)  In the suit, the states argued the overtime rule that was announced by President Barack Obama is unconstitutional as it dictates the wages states must pay employees for government functions and exceeds congressional authority.

As of this posting, although there has been no formal response from the Department of Labor or the Obama administration, prior comments from Labor Department official David Weil indicated that the Department of Labor was confident the rule would be upheld in court.

I think it is certainly possible that an injunction could be issued to prevent the implementation of the new overtime rule.  Although the judge these two cases are before, Judge Amos Mazzant, is a President Obama appointee...something that could essentially mean 'game over' for this challenge to the new overtime rules.  With that being said, this is far from over.  Stay tuned.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

Breaking: Labor Secretary Rumored to Be Leaving Administration

A few hours ago, word leaked out that Labor Secretary Marty Walsh (“Walsh”) is in the midst of negotiations to head up the NHL Players Union and leave his position at the Labor Department. Walsh, who has served as the sole Labor Secretary under President Biden, has taken part in a labor renaissance of sorts as support for organized labor has increased during his term as Labor Secretary (although the number of workers that have joined a union over the past two years has not grown as mush as some expected.)  He has also overseen the ongoing negotiations with rail workers over a new contract, although that matter is still on shaky ground and playing out as we speak. As for who might step into the vacant Labor Secretary role, there are already rumblings that President Biden should nominate Deputy Labor Secretary Julie Su (a strong labor advocate) or even a progressive like Senator Bernie Sanders.  Until Walsh officially gives his notice, however, I would expect some/many potential...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations