Skip to main content

Breaking: Two Lawsuits Filed to Challenge the Department of Labor's Overtime Pay Rule


Although I had already posted an article earlier this morning, this breaking development out of Texas is too important to not write about immediately.


Earlier today, two lawsuits were filed to challenge the new overtime rules.  The first suit was brought by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.  The second was brought by several business groups and officials from 21 states.  Both suits were filed in federal court in the Eastern District of Texas to challenge the Department of Labor's new overtime rules set to take effect December 1.  (The 21 states include Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, and Wisconsin).  For those needing a refresher, under the new overtime rules, employers would be required to pay overtime to any salaried worker that earns less than $47,500/year.  (Note, that threshold is double the current minimum rate of $23,660/year.)  In the suit, the states argued the overtime rule that was announced by President Barack Obama is unconstitutional as it dictates the wages states must pay employees for government functions and exceeds congressional authority.

As of this posting, although there has been no formal response from the Department of Labor or the Obama administration, prior comments from Labor Department official David Weil indicated that the Department of Labor was confident the rule would be upheld in court.

I think it is certainly possible that an injunction could be issued to prevent the implementation of the new overtime rule.  Although the judge these two cases are before, Judge Amos Mazzant, is a President Obama appointee...something that could essentially mean 'game over' for this challenge to the new overtime rules.  With that being said, this is far from over.  Stay tuned.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more