Skip to main content

One to Keep An Eye On: NLRB v. Murphy Oil


As with many employment and labor law related cases being litigated around the country, there are always a few that stand out.  This is one to keep an eye on.


Facts:  The National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") issued a decision in 2014 in this case that employment contracts which banned class action lawsuits and required employees to arbitrate employment disputes on an individual basis violated the National Labor Relations Act.

The Main Issue:  Are employment contracts that require workers to arbitrate disputes individually, and constitute class action waivers, valid under federal labor laws?

Current Status:  A petition for certiorari was filed with the United States Supreme Court by the NLRB and the Justice Department.

Looking Ahead:  I think it is likely that the Supreme Court will consider this issue as two prior cert petitions were recently filed by employers (Epic Systems and Ernst & Young) that also dealt with class action waivers.  Given the split among circuits on the issue (the 5th and 8th Circuits favor class action wavers; the 7th and 9th Circuits have sided with employees and held class waivers were unenforceable; and the 3rd, 4th, 6th, 11th, and D.C. Circuits all currently have the issue in pending cases), I think the Supreme Court is likely to step in and resolve the matter.  

With that being said, the next question is which case the Court will pick to resolve the Circuit split...at this point, there are three good cases on the topic that could be considered.  Also keep in mind that if a new Supreme Court Justice is not appointed before this case is heard and a deadlocked 4 - 4 ruling resulted, the Circuit decisions would stand (even though a split would remain).

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Senator Bernie Sanders To Introduce Bill Requiring Large Corporations To Pay For Federal Assistance Programs

Next week, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders is set to introduce legislation which would require large employers such as Walmart, Amazon, and McDonald's to fully cover the cost of food stamps, public housing, Medicaid, and other federal assistance programs that their employees receive.  Senator Sanders has stated that the goal is to force these large employers to pay their employees a living wage and cut back on the nearly $150 billion in taxpayer dollars that go toward funding these federal programs every year. As for the specifics, a 100% tax on government benefits received would be imposed on government benefits received by workers at companies with 500 or more employees.  For instance, if a Walmart employee received $500 in food stamps, Walmart would be taxed $500. To call this proposed legislation groundbreaking would be an understatement.  I would expect that Senator Sanders, an Independent that caucuses with Democrats, is going to face an uphill battle gett...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more