Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week: NLRB Grad Student Ruling Edition


A few weeks ago, the NLRB made a major ruling when it decided that graduate students at private universities can unionize.  To many, this was a landmark decision that again overturned prior NLRB rulings.  Even though the dust has not settled yet, I think this is a good time to highlight a few articles which touch on that NLRB ruling.

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


A Closer Look at the Board's Ruling and Resulting Impact

Natasha Baker over at Inside Higher Ed has one of the more well thought out examinations of the Board's ruling and what the possible impact might be.  Tracking the Board's decision and analysis, Baker does a good job tracking prior decisions that ultimately led to this one.  It goes without saying that Baker took it one step further and offered a look at what the possible impact this decision could have going forward.  I would consider this a good supplement to those who want to read more than just the Board's decision.


Ten Yale Graduate Departments File For Union Elections

To the surprise of probably very few, once the Board's decision was announced, it did not take long for graduate students to take steps to unionize.  In this instance, Yale graduate students in ten departments filed petitions with the National Labor Relations Board and requested an election of a union.  This certainly is not the last time we will see graduate students taking advantage of the Board's decision.


Yale Attempts to Challenge Graduate Students Seeking to Unionize

As a follow up to the prior article, Yale is challenging a bid by some graduate students at the university who are seeking to unionize.  The hearing on Yale's challenge began earlier this week and is expected to continue for several days.  This is definately one to keep an eye on.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...