Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


It was difficult to narrow things down this week and pick just a few articles to highlight.  With that being said, the article that touched on the NLRB's joint employer standard decision from last year was well thought out and certainly worth a read (even for those who do not follow NLRB/labor law developments).

As always, below are a couple articles that caught my eye this week.


Minnesota Supreme Court Blocks $15/Hour Minimum Wage Ballot Measure

Last week, I had pointed out to readers that the Minnesota Supreme Court would hear arguments this week on whether to allow a $15/hour minimum wage ballot measure would appear on the November ballot.  The Supreme Court issued a unanimous order the day after it heard the case and held that the ballot measure would not appear on the November ballot.  The Supreme Court agreed with the city of Minneapolis and held that the proposal to raise the minimum wage rate in the city was not a proper subject for an amendment to the city's charter (as proponents of the $15/hour minimum wage had argued).  I certainly do not think this is the end of the matter.  But for the time being, minimum wage rates in Minneapolis are not going up.


29 Major Companies Back White House Equal Pay Pledge

To date, 29 major companies including FaceBook, Apple, General Motors, and Nike (among others) have signed a pledge to back the White House equal pay measure announced earlier this year.  According to the pledge, these companies are committed to equal pay among its workers, conducting an annual analysis of its pay, and monitoring its hiring/promotion procedures to reduce bias.  Fascinating read to see how some of these major companies have come on board with the continued push for equal pay in the workplace.



Readers might remember an NLRB ruling from last year in which the Board expanded the instances in which one employer is liable for another employer's labor law violations.  In its decision, the Board held that joint employer liability may be established where one company exercises indirect or unexercised potential control.  Trey Kovacs over at The Hill writes that Congress should take immediate steps to reverse the Board's decision.  It is a well written article...but in an election year (and when many Republicans are up for re-election), I would be surprised if there is any substantial movement for the time being.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more