Skip to main content

What I've Been Reading This Week


Some of you may have read the Fifty Shades of Grey book or went to see the movie the past few weeks.  I came across a rather timely article on the topic that I wanted to lead this "What I've Been Reading This Week" post with.  I do want to suggest that employers be mindful that allowing employees to openly discuss this book and/or movie is a potential hostile work environment claim waiting to happen...

As always, below are a few articles that caught my eye this week.


Fifty Shades of Grey & the Workplace

Suzanne Lucas has a good article on how the new Fifty Shades of Grey movie can lead to a sexual harassment lawsuit and what employers can do to head off the issue.  For those who do not know, there are some rather "suggestive" parts of the book that may be appropriate for a book club discussion, but not fit for the workplace.  Suzanne included a few ideas on what employers can do to limit potential liability when this topic is brought up in the workplace by other employees.


The Brian Williams Situation: A Lesson For Employers

Joe Lustig writes several good blogs each week that I enjoy reading through when I have a few spare minutes.  This week was no exception.  He has a good note on what employers can learn from this situation; namely to document important conversations and incidents immediately after they happen, rather than trying to remember the details after the fact.  This one is definitely worth a read for employers. 


Denying Employment for Falsifying a Job Application?

We have all heard it at one time or another:  a job applicant "fudges" the information they list on the job application and the employer finds out about it.  The question then becomes, ok, so now what?  Nick Fishman has a couple good thoughts on the topic and highlights that at the end of the day, it is still legal to reject a candidate for falsifying an application (so long as the appropriate steps are taken to comply with an adverse action process.


California Invalidates Meal Period Waiver Rules for Healthcare Workers

This is one of the better California related employment law blogs I read and recently, they had a good article on a ruling from the California Court of Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District in regard to meal period waiver rules for healthcare workers.  The case, Gerard v. Orange Coast Mem'l Med. Ctr., clarified that healthcare workers who work shifts of over 12 hours have a right to unpaid, off duty meal periods of at least 30 minutes.  Go ahead and check out their write up for additional information on the ruling.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more