Skip to main content

One to Keep An Eye On: Callaghan v. Darlington Fabrics, Rhode Island Superior Court


As with many employment and labor law related cases that are being litigated around the country, there are always a few that stand out.  This is one to keep an eye on.


Facts:  A Rhode Island graduate student filed a lawsuit late last year against a textile company on the grounds that it discriminated against her because she used medical marijuana and was a registered medical marijuana card holder.  Apparently the company rescinded a paid internship offer to the student, Christine Callaghan, after Callaghan disclosed that she used medical marijuana because of migraines she suffered.  After Callaghan disclosed her use to a Darlington HR representative, Callaghan was contacted shortly thereafter and told she would not be offered the internship because of her status as a medical marijuana card holder and user.

Looking Back:  As noted over on the Orrick Blog, this suit appears to be the first to invoke the anti discrimination provisions of Rhode Island's medical marijuana law.  Note that under Rhode Island's law, schools, employers, and landlords may not "refuse to enroll, employ, or lease to, or otherwise penalize a person solely for his or her status as a card holder."

The Main Issue:  Whether the medical marijuana statute's anti discrimination language in regard to "solely for his or her status as a card holder" means that an employer in Rhode Island can lawfully make a[n employment] decision because of card holder status, if there is at least one other lawful reason for the [employment] decision?

Current Status:  At this point, the case is still in the very early stages of litigation.  The complaint was just filed late last year so this one has a ways to go yet.


A copy of the complaint can be found here:  http://riaclu.org/documents/Callaghan_v_Darlington_Complaint.pdf

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

Senator Bernie Sanders To Introduce Bill Requiring Large Corporations To Pay For Federal Assistance Programs

Next week, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders is set to introduce legislation which would require large employers such as Walmart, Amazon, and McDonald's to fully cover the cost of food stamps, public housing, Medicaid, and other federal assistance programs that their employees receive.  Senator Sanders has stated that the goal is to force these large employers to pay their employees a living wage and cut back on the nearly $150 billion in taxpayer dollars that go toward funding these federal programs every year. As for the specifics, a 100% tax on government benefits received would be imposed on government benefits received by workers at companies with 500 or more employees.  For instance, if a Walmart employee received $500 in food stamps, Walmart would be taxed $500. To call this proposed legislation groundbreaking would be an understatement.  I would expect that Senator Sanders, an Independent that caucuses with Democrats, is going to face an uphill battle gett...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more