Skip to main content

Senate Republicans Propose Overhaul of NLRA & NLRB


Late last month, Republican Senators Mitch McConnell and Lamar Alexander proposed legislation which would overhaul the National Labor Relations Act and subsequently the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB").  

A few key parts of this bill:

  • The NLRB would go from 5 members to 6, requiring an even split among Republicans and Democrats.  All decisions would subsequently require the agreement of at least 4 members.
  • The five year term of Board members would be synched up so that a Republican and Democrat seat are up for nomination at the same time.
  • Parties in a case would have 30 days to seek review of a general counsel's complaint in federal court and would create new rights that would allow them to obtain documents relevant to the complaint within 10 days.
  • Funding would also be reduced 20 percent if the Board is not able to decide 90 percent of its cases within one year over the first two year period post reform.  (Talk about lighting a fire under the NLRB to get them moving).
  • As well, as to the appointment of Board members, the bill would replace "appointed by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate" with "appointed by the President, after consultation with the leader of the Senate representing the party opposing the party of the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate."  (Remember the issue over "recess appointments" of Board members by Obama?  This would be a way for the opposing party to somewhat force the President to engage in a dialogue before acting).

Whether this legislation will go anywhere is the first question that should be asked.  Given that Republicans control the Senate, there is some hope...but of course Obama would likely veto this bill as is.  I do not think that the Republicans could get the votes needed to overcome that veto, however.  

At this point, the bill will likely be sent to the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee (which is chaired by Senator Alexander) for consideration.  Stay tuned.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more