Skip to main content

Senate Republicans Propose Overhaul of NLRA & NLRB


Late last month, Republican Senators Mitch McConnell and Lamar Alexander proposed legislation which would overhaul the National Labor Relations Act and subsequently the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB").  

A few key parts of this bill:

  • The NLRB would go from 5 members to 6, requiring an even split among Republicans and Democrats.  All decisions would subsequently require the agreement of at least 4 members.
  • The five year term of Board members would be synched up so that a Republican and Democrat seat are up for nomination at the same time.
  • Parties in a case would have 30 days to seek review of a general counsel's complaint in federal court and would create new rights that would allow them to obtain documents relevant to the complaint within 10 days.
  • Funding would also be reduced 20 percent if the Board is not able to decide 90 percent of its cases within one year over the first two year period post reform.  (Talk about lighting a fire under the NLRB to get them moving).
  • As well, as to the appointment of Board members, the bill would replace "appointed by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate" with "appointed by the President, after consultation with the leader of the Senate representing the party opposing the party of the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate."  (Remember the issue over "recess appointments" of Board members by Obama?  This would be a way for the opposing party to somewhat force the President to engage in a dialogue before acting).

Whether this legislation will go anywhere is the first question that should be asked.  Given that Republicans control the Senate, there is some hope...but of course Obama would likely veto this bill as is.  I do not think that the Republicans could get the votes needed to overcome that veto, however.  

At this point, the bill will likely be sent to the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee (which is chaired by Senator Alexander) for consideration.  Stay tuned.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...