Skip to main content

The Great EEOC Roundup: January Edition


After a few months of not posting the EEOC Roundup, I wanted to get back into the swing of things and highlight a few EEOC matters from the past month.  Coincidentally enough, two of the cases that I wanted to highlight both deal with religious discrimination claims involving the same religion, Rastafarian.

As always, there are some recent EEOC cases that jump out at me when I review recent developments on that front.  Below are a couple EEOC cases and settlements that stand out:


Triangle Catering Sued for Religious Discrimination

Recently, the EEOC brought suit against a Raleigh, North Carolina company on the grounds that it failed to accommodate an employee's religious beliefs and subsequently fired him because of his religion.  The company, Triangle Catering, allegedly told an employee, Michael Reddick, Jr., that he had to remove his religious head covering while he worked for the company.  Reddick had been a practicing Rastafarian for over 15 years and wore a small cap to cover his head for religious reasons.  

Reddick told the company that he could not remove the head covering because of religious beliefs and was subsequently terminated as a result. 

The complained of conduct violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

EEOC Press Release:  http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/1-13-15a.cfm


Mims Distributing To Pay $50,000.00 to Settle Religious Discrimination Claim

The EEOC announced that Mims Distributing will pay $50,000.00 to settle a religious discrimination claim brought by a former employee.  At the time he applied for employment, Christopher Alston, was a practicing Rastafarian.  According to the religion, he could not cut his hair.  However, when Alston was told that if he wanted to be hired as a driver, he would have to cut his hair.  Even though Alston explained he could not cut his hair because of his religious beliefs, Mims apparently refused to hire him because he would not comply.

This conduct violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as Mims was required to reasonably accommodate an employee's religious beliefs as long as doing so would not pose an undue hardship, which it failed to do.

EEOC Press Release:  http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/1-20-15.cfm

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum, it was noted that emplo
Post a Comment
Read more

What I’ve Been Reading This Week

A few years ago, I remember when the “Fight for $15” movement was taking off around the country.  Lo and behold, it appears that a $15/hour minimum wage is not the stopping point, which should be no surprise.  As the below article notes, New York is aggressively moving to ramp up hourly wage rates even higher.  While all the  below articles are worth a read, I called particular attention to that one. As always, below are a couple article that caught my eye this week. Disney World Workers Reject Latest Contract Offer Late last week, it was announced that workers at Disney World had rejected the most recent contract offer from the company, calling on their employer to do better.  As Brooks Barnes at The New York Times writes, the unions that represent about 32,000 workers at Disney World reported their members resoundingly rejected the 5 year contract offer which would have seen workers receive a 10% raise and retroactive increased back pay.  While Disney’s offer would have increased pa
Post a Comment
Read more

Utah Non-Compete Bill Falters in House

Last month, a non-compete bill sponsored by Representative Brian Greene (Republican from Pleasant Grove) & up for vote in the Utah House failed to make it through the Legislature.  The bill sought to ban enforcement of non-competes if they came after a worker was already employed, given no compensation (such as a bonus or promotion) for signing the non-compete, and laid off within six months.  However, by a 22 - 49 vote, the bill was resoundingly defeated after some business groups lobbied to kill the non-compete bill.  One group in particular, The Free Enterprise Utah coalition, argued that the Utah State Legislature should hold off on any changes to non compete laws in the state until a survey about non competes was done among Utah businesses.  Representative Greene had countered this claim and argued that a survey was not needed to show that the current non compete laws in the states allowed many businesses, including some small high tech companies in the state, to per
Post a Comment
Read more