Skip to main content

How Wal Mart Deals With Union Organizing


With the recent vote by Amazon workers that decided not to form a union (Amazon Workers Say NO To a Union), Wal Mart is one of the big companies that has also been able to resist their employees forming a union. 

With Wal Mart's ability to keep unions out, questions have arisen about how they have been able to do it.  Recently, slides that Wal Mart used to educate its management on how to remain union free were leaked:  Wal Mart Slides.  An internal memo (Wal Mart Memo) that Wal Mart used to advise its managers on how to deal with employees who walked out also created controversy.  When these slides and memo were released, many pro union groups and employees complained that the tactics used by Wal Mart were illegal and "violated the spirit of the law."  While the ways that Wal Mart has been able to keep unions out might appear to be heavy handed and in violation of NLRB rules, it does not appear that anything that has been done "violated the spirit of the law."  Rather, it seems like Wal Mart has developed an effective strategy that other companies could adopt when dealing with potential union organizing.

With such a big company like Wal Mart and the number of employees it employs, it is likely that union organizing efforts will continue.  This will be an interesting one to keep an eye on, especially if the continued "pro union tilt" NLRB gets more involved going forward.


Thanks to HR Capitalist for additional information on the topic.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NLRB: Discussion Among Employees About Tip Pooling is Protected Concerted Activity

  This Advice Memorandum from the National Labor Relations Board’s Associate General Counsel, Jayme Sophir, addressed whether employees which discussed and complained about tip pooling at work constituted protected concerted activity. In relevant part, an employer in New York operated a chain of steakhouses.  While tip pooling was in place at these steakhouses, some of the employees objected to it on the grounds that it was not transparent and improperly divided tips among the workers.  Employees were told not to complain or talk to each other about the tip pool and were told that doing so would endanger their jobs.  Despite the employer later attempting to provide some clarity as to how the tips were being divided, rancor still existed among some employees.  At one point, the employees were told by a general manager that some employees that had been talking about the tip pool were “cleared out” and the employer would continue to do so. In the Advice Memorandum,...
Post a Comment
Read more

San Diego Rolls Back Vaccine Mandate For City Workers

Last Tuesday, the San Diego City Council voted to do away with the vaccine mandate for city employees. The city’s vaccine mandate that was in place required city workers to get the coronavirus vaccine or risk termination.  Perhaps to this surprise of no one, the city’s policy came under fire with 14 employees being terminated and over 100 other employees resigning.  With the coronavirus subsiding, including in Southern California, the San Diego City Council took action. Now, bear in mind, the repeal of the vaccine mandate does not take place immediately. With that being said, the mandate will be repealed March 8th.  I suppose the question now is, what other cities or regions follow San Diego’s lead? For additional information:   https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/story/2023-01-24/san-diego-repeals-controversial-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-citing-drop-in-cases-hospitalizations
Post a Comment
Read more

NLRB: Former Employee Cannot Be Barred From Work Premises After Filing Wage Suit

MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC - NLRB Facts :  MEI-GSR Holdings, LLC d/b/a Grand Sierra Resort & Casino ("GSR") operated a facility that included a hotel, casino, restaurant, clubs, bars, and a pool which were all open to the general public.  Tiffany Sargent ("Sargent") was briefly employed by GSR as a "beverage supervisor" in December of 2012.  After her employment ended, Sargent continued to socialize at one of the clubs.  GSR had a long standing practice of allowing former employees to patronize its facility and did not prohibit Sargent from doing so.  In June of 2013, Sargent and another employee filed a class and collective action against GSR for alleged unpaid wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and Nevada law.  In July of 2014, GSR denied Sargent access to an event at one of the clubs.  GSR followed up with a letter and stated that with the on-going litigation (from the wage suit), it decided to bar Sargent from the premises. ...
1 comment
Read more